• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Ruthbridge, Cahot

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ruthbridge, Cahot

    Hi there,

    Hope I'm doing this right - I'm a 'new girl' to the site. Was wondering if anyone could help with my problem, I'll try and keep it as short as poss although unfortunately it's a bit complicated.

    By way of background: in 1997/98 I took on a mortgatge and lived at 26 Taylor Close. In 2002 I moved out of the property with my 3mth old son and moved back into my parent's home just down the road (Sevenoaks Rd). I still own & pay the mortgage on Taylor Close and since 2004 it has been let out.

    Monday 8 June - Mum rang tel no. on ‘The Occupier’ letter sent to Taylor Cl (tenant's left lost of debt etc.). (v. rude). I telephoned back that afternoon. Asked for name and d.o.b. for security purposes – which I gave!! Woman v. rude & unhelpful. Could give no indication of what the debt was regarding ‘client didn’t supply that information’! Told to put anything in writing.
    Wednesday 10 June - Letter from Ruthbridge now addressed to me.
    Monday 15 June - Letter from me sent to Ruthbridge (1st class) (apparently this was not received!)
    Tuesday 16 June - Letter from Ruthbridge marked ‘Without Prejudice’. Giving notice they had been advised to commence bankruptcy proceedings (may include costs & interest). £1621.26 – is a principle sum. Prepared to accept lump sum payment of £972.76 if received no later than 30 June. This would be Full & Final Settlement against liability and ensure that I’m not pursued for remainder. As added incentive – once sum rec’d their client will instruct credit reference agencies to make debt as ‘satisfied’
    Monday 29 June - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge rang (mum’s home no.). I returned call x4 – left msg mum’s no. was not my telephone no. and was never given as a contact no. neither was it to be used in future.
    Monday 29 June - Letter from me to Ruthbridge. Request contact in writing only to Taylor Close.
    Tuesday 30 June - X 2 letters received from Ruthbridge. 1st – instructed to cover debt. ‘Imperative’ I contact them to arrange for local agent to call.
    2nd – headed ‘Debt Counselling Dept’ – Yr a/c has been referred to our Debt Counselling Service! Service funded by Ruthbridge and provided free of charge. If ignored will have to refer to Debt Enforcement.
    Wednesday 1 July - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge rang mum’s no. again. Spoke with Neil. I returned call. Mr Blair v. sarcastic. Talks extremely quickly. Apparently did not receive my letter of Monday 15th June. Confirmed would resend.
    Friday 3 July - Resent a copy of my letter dated 15th June recorded delivery to Ruthbridge
    Monday 5 July - Brian Blair, Ruthbridge rang work (a.m.) left message with work colleague.
    Tuesday 7 July - Telephoned C.A.B. Advised to write stating did not acknowledge debt and not to speak with them via telephone.
    Wednesday 8 July - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge telephoned mum’s no. again. Must have gone to Taylor Close as told mum was not there and got Buchan and Burns mixed up. Quickly mentioned, land registry updates.
    Thursday 9 July - Letter from me to Ruthbridge (sent recorded delivery). Advised contacted C.A.B. Did not acknowledge debt. As requested previously both in writing and verbally contact by them to be in writing only to Taylor Close – if they continued to ring no. which was not mine nor ever given to them as well as fact did not work normal 9 to 5 shift pattern I would view this has harassment and pursue with OFT & Trading Standards (On Mondays I work 11am to 6pm and Wed, Thurs & Fridays work 5pm to midnight.)
    Thursday 23 July - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge rang work who advised I was on holiday. He left message for my return.
    Thursday 23 July - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge rang mum’s no. again v. early in morning. (I was in Scotland).
    She refused to speak with him.
    Thursday 23 July - Letter from Ruthbridge demanding payment by 31 July and enclosing copy ‘Reply Card’!
    Wednesday 5 August - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge, rang mum’s no. (x2) and rang my work no.( x1)
    [Tuesday 11 August – check date] - Mr Blair, Ruthbridge left msg on mum’s no. He had called work and now knows I don’t start until 5p.m.!
    Wednesday 12 August - Mr Blair of Ruthbridge rang work between 10 to 14 times in the space of 1hr. Extremely rude to work colleagues. Would not give name only ref and tel no. Told me I had said about owning x2 properties!!! Keeps saying he has calls recorded etc. Told me what time I started (17.00-actually shift change due to holidays). Accused work colleagues of lying. Said Terri ‘pretended’ to take details. Gave impression to reception – work related.
    Asked to speak to Dawn, supervisor, asked how many people work in dept. – I queried if this was work related – he would not answer but got very angry. Said reception said I was in building (checked – they had not). Repeatedly asked him to please listen and if he did not let me speak would have no option but to hang-up – which I did.
    He did ring back, Denise on reception advised would not put call through – he kept trying to coerce her by saying ‘ let me get this straight, Miss Buchan has instructed you as a 3rd party not to put my call through’. Denise would only reply ‘No’ she herself was not putting call through. He rang so many times that blocked switchboard and had clients in and deal being closed.
    Friday 14 August - Letter from Ruthbridge dated 10th August, postmarked 12th August received Friday 14th August addressed to me at 49 Sevenoaks Road saying I must ring or a representative will just turn up (at my mum's address!)
    Friday 14 August - Went to C.A.B. offices – Closed early due to staff shortages!
    Monday 17 August - Tried ringing C.A.B. (x2) – couldn’t get through. When tried again – answer-phone msg, closed for day.
    My biggest concern is if someone turns up at my mum's address as this would really stress her out (especially as my dad passed away a couple of years (unexpectedly) and these people are extremely pushy, rude and threatening.
    My next concern is that they have sent a copy Reply Card with my signature on, I'm concerned because I know I didn't apply for a credit credit but suspect by ex could have done this and quite frankly I'd rather pay the debt then have any contact with him (due to domestic violence, family court proceedings etc).
    The other concern is they obviously do not both listening or reading any correspondence as they continue to telephone and have now started writing to me at my mum's, so I'm assuming he must have checked the electrol role.

  • #2
    Re: Ruthbridge, Cahot

    Okay to summarise:

    You had tenants in your property who took out a debt and didn't pay it back.

    Creditor (Cahoot?) sold debt to Ruthbridge DCA

    Ruthbridge sent letters to now empty property which you collected and contacted Ruthbridge to find out what the debt was.

    Ruthbridge hassle hell out of you, your mum etc and break a million debt collection guidance rules.


    That sounds straightforward enough to there.

    The issue is the last paragraph - the reply card Ruthbridge sent you had your signature on ?

    Why did they send you the copy application/reply card and when you wrote to them did you sign the letter with your signature ?


    And look at this too BBC - Watchdog: Ruthbridge - chasing debts
    Last edited by Amethyst; 17th August 2009, 17:50:PM.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Ruthbridge, Cahot

      Have a read here and just see how many guidelines they have broken

      http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/bus...dit/oft664.pdf

      Then read here Complaints to OFT about DCA's and make sure your printer is topped up with extra ink and paper
      Any opinions I give are my own. Any advice I give is without liability. If you are unsure, please seek qualified legal advice.

      IF WE HAVE HELPED YOU PLEASE CONSIDER UPGRADING TO VIP - click here

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Ruthbridge, Cahot

        Tuesday 18 August - Louise answers phone and tells Mr B-liar that if his company doesn't cease their persistent and criminal harrassment she will very likely have a nervous breakdown which will result in her coming round to insert, but is not limited to, a very large object between Mr B-liar's buttocks until his teeth fall out.

        (Valid, even if not read by brain dead moron called B-Liar)
        My Blog
        http://cabotfanclub.wordpress.com

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse
        1 of 2 < >

        SHORTCUTS


        First Steps
        Check dates
        Income/Expenditure
        Acknowledge Claim
        CCA Request
        CPR 31.14 Request
        Subject Access Request Letter
        Example Defence
        Set Aside Application
        Directions Questionnaire



        If you received a court claim and would like some help and support dealing with it, please read the first steps and make a new thread in the forum with as much information as you can.





        NOTE: If you receive a court claim note these dates in your calendar ...
        Acknowledge Claim - within 14 days from Service

        Defend Claim - within 28 days from Service (IF you acknowledged in time)

        If you fail to Acknowledge the claim you may have a default judgment awarded against you, likewise, if you fail to enter your defence within 28 days from Service.




        We now feature a number of specialist consumer credit debt solicitors on our sister site, JustBeagle.com
        If your case is over £10,000 or particularly complex it may be worth a chat with a solicitor, often they will be able to help on a fixed fee or CFA (no win, no fee) basis.
        2 of 2 < >

        Support LegalBeagles


        Donate with PayPal button

        LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

        See more
        See less

        Court Claim ?

        Guides and Letters
        Loading...



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X