Hi everyone
So today we went to court against Cabot/Mortimer clarke as they applied for a stay to be lift and summary judgement made,
we have sent letters to them in the past asking to see the Deed of assignment but nothing .
We told the judge this and he said we have no legal right to see the deed, he did say (after my prompt) that the notice of assignment was all that is needed, but was not satisfied that it had be served correctly as it states in sec 196 of CCA .
So we now have to see if they can prove it ??
So looking on these forums i've noticed that there are other angles that i can fight this i,e, agreement not signed ,
So my question is this do i change my defence and go again with potential extra costs or what ?
Do i fight all the way ?
Any help or advice will be very greatful
Chrees
Rich
So today we went to court against Cabot/Mortimer clarke as they applied for a stay to be lift and summary judgement made,
we have sent letters to them in the past asking to see the Deed of assignment but nothing .
We told the judge this and he said we have no legal right to see the deed, he did say (after my prompt) that the notice of assignment was all that is needed, but was not satisfied that it had be served correctly as it states in sec 196 of CCA .
So we now have to see if they can prove it ??
So looking on these forums i've noticed that there are other angles that i can fight this i,e, agreement not signed ,
So my question is this do i change my defence and go again with potential extra costs or what ?
Do i fight all the way ?
Any help or advice will be very greatful
Chrees
Rich
Comment