I am a Claimant in the process of pursuing a debt through the Small Claims court. Prior to commencing legal proceedings, the Defendant has admitted (verbally and in writing) to part of the claim, and at the same time is trying to deduct monies that she has paid elsewhere but says I should reimburse her for. I do not accept her reasons for doing so.
The court has confirmed the claim is now defended, and I have a copy of the Defence and Counterclaim form N9B completed by the Defendant. She has ticked that she 'disputes the full amount,' but goes on in her Defence to submit the letter I have from her admitting to part of the claim, and her reasons for wishing to deduct the money she has paid elsewhere and believes I should reimburse her for.
On form N9B she has NOT completed that she wishes to make a counterclaim.
Please could you advise me on how this will be viewed if it reaches a hearing - are there any implications due to the fact that:
a) she has ticked she disputes the full amount but has openly admitted to part of the claim
and
b) not submitted a counterclaim for the money she is seeking reimbursement for?
Many thanks
The court has confirmed the claim is now defended, and I have a copy of the Defence and Counterclaim form N9B completed by the Defendant. She has ticked that she 'disputes the full amount,' but goes on in her Defence to submit the letter I have from her admitting to part of the claim, and her reasons for wishing to deduct the money she has paid elsewhere and believes I should reimburse her for.
On form N9B she has NOT completed that she wishes to make a counterclaim.
Please could you advise me on how this will be viewed if it reaches a hearing - are there any implications due to the fact that:
a) she has ticked she disputes the full amount but has openly admitted to part of the claim
and
b) not submitted a counterclaim for the money she is seeking reimbursement for?
Many thanks
Comment