Tweet
Re: Stalling ?
Following some PMs from mickeyboy, for the sake of those following this thread and in the hopes of other advice, the situation appears to be as follows:
mickeyboy entrusted his bike to Mr. TS for sale.
Mr TS appeared to be a sole trader, t/a RK out of premises in B. Road.
When the bike appeared to have been sold, but no money was forthcoming, mickeyboy commenced court proceedings
He named the claimant as Mr TS.
The defence is that in fact Mr TS was an employee of RK which is a trading name of TSR, and the wrong person was named as defendant.
It now becomes interesting.
RK trades in Motorcycles from a retail shop.Not a registered company.
TSR, a registered Ltd company, gives its occupation as "Retail sale via mail order houses or via internet" (No retail motorcycle shop)
No Officers are listed but Mr TS & Mr DS (brothers?) with the same correspondence address as RK. resigned as officers Feb 2015.
Two shareholders: Mr TS & MR DS
The only other connection I can find is on a third party website which describes TSR t/a RM (see below)
Now there is also a company called RM ltd which deals in motor cycles.
Its registered address is just a mail drop.
Current officer is Mr TS
If you look for its trading premises you find yourself back at RK
They have filed for voluntary strike off, which will be effective Nov 2015.
Who should be named as defendant?
When the bike was left for sale it was done without receipts or paperwork, because OP thought they were friends.
I wonder if the name of the defendant could/should be changed ((www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/creditor-and-claimant-questions-and-answers/can-I-change-the-defendant-name.aspx) but to whom?
RM perhaps and then objecting to the strike off(/www.gov.uk/object-to-a-limited-company-being-struck-off) on the grounds there is an outstanding court case.
The two motorcycle trade names are very similar and RM and RK seem to be used interchangeably and even appear together on one website!
Following some PMs from mickeyboy, for the sake of those following this thread and in the hopes of other advice, the situation appears to be as follows:
mickeyboy entrusted his bike to Mr. TS for sale.
Mr TS appeared to be a sole trader, t/a RK out of premises in B. Road.
When the bike appeared to have been sold, but no money was forthcoming, mickeyboy commenced court proceedings
He named the claimant as Mr TS.
The defence is that in fact Mr TS was an employee of RK which is a trading name of TSR, and the wrong person was named as defendant.
It now becomes interesting.
RK trades in Motorcycles from a retail shop.Not a registered company.
TSR, a registered Ltd company, gives its occupation as "Retail sale via mail order houses or via internet" (No retail motorcycle shop)
No Officers are listed but Mr TS & Mr DS (brothers?) with the same correspondence address as RK. resigned as officers Feb 2015.
Two shareholders: Mr TS & MR DS
The only other connection I can find is on a third party website which describes TSR t/a RM (see below)
Now there is also a company called RM ltd which deals in motor cycles.
Its registered address is just a mail drop.
Current officer is Mr TS
If you look for its trading premises you find yourself back at RK
They have filed for voluntary strike off, which will be effective Nov 2015.
Who should be named as defendant?
When the bike was left for sale it was done without receipts or paperwork, because OP thought they were friends.
I wonder if the name of the defendant could/should be changed ((www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/creditor-and-claimant-questions-and-answers/can-I-change-the-defendant-name.aspx) but to whom?
RM perhaps and then objecting to the strike off(/www.gov.uk/object-to-a-limited-company-being-struck-off) on the grounds there is an outstanding court case.
The two motorcycle trade names are very similar and RM and RK seem to be used interchangeably and even appear together on one website!
Comment