Tweet
Long story short - I have made a Court claim for admin charges against Rossendales who kept sending letters regarding a tax credit I genuinely have no idea why this is due? (£237)
I had contacted HMRC to ask why the debt was owed (no response) and I requested Rossendales to supply reason (after initial "pay up" letter from them) or admin charges would be charged for future letters not providing a reason for debt due.
7 further letters were received with no explanation for why the debt was due? After a letter before action, warning them of the Court action I would take if no explanation for the alleged debt being due was received, I made a Court claim.
They acknowledged the claim and "invited" the Court to strike out my claim as not valid. Court refused and assigned to my local Court for small claims (which I was looking forward too!)
However, now received Court letter that claim struck out on the basis I had "no grounds" to bring claim as defendant has made a "without hearing" application?
Any suggestions on how to counter this move would be greatly appreciated!
I had contacted HMRC to ask why the debt was owed (no response) and I requested Rossendales to supply reason (after initial "pay up" letter from them) or admin charges would be charged for future letters not providing a reason for debt due.
7 further letters were received with no explanation for why the debt was due? After a letter before action, warning them of the Court action I would take if no explanation for the alleged debt being due was received, I made a Court claim.
They acknowledged the claim and "invited" the Court to strike out my claim as not valid. Court refused and assigned to my local Court for small claims (which I was looking forward too!)
However, now received Court letter that claim struck out on the basis I had "no grounds" to bring claim as defendant has made a "without hearing" application?
Any suggestions on how to counter this move would be greatly appreciated!
Comment