Hi all
I'm trying to assist a friend who has been screwed over by a planning consultant.
The man took £2,500 in fees up front to appeal a planning refusal decision. (This was agreed verbally but there are some text messages evidencing the agreement.)
After payment, it became clear that he was doing no work on the appeal and was ignoring all calls, messages and emails from my friend trying to discuss things.
In fact in the two months since taking payment there has not been a single conversation and the only contact from the consultant has been 4 text messages making excuses for why he hasnt been in touch and promising a call later that day or the next which never arrives.
With the deadline for the appeal approaching, my friend messaged him saying if he didnt hear from him with evidence of work done, he would take that to mean there was no intention of doing it and would be forced to hire someone else (to make sure it was submitted on time).
This is exactly what happened. The message was ignored and my friend engaged another agent to do the work (paying out another £3,000).
I helped him write a Letter Before Action laying out the situation, the number of ignored calls, the dates of messages and emails and requesting a return of the monies paid, and giving 14 days to respond.
The only response was a message (just beyond the 14 days) with more excuses (admitting he had done no work due to poor mental health) saying he could still get it done in time, and promising a full reply to the letter the next day (which of course never arrived).
I now want to submit a claim for the fees for my friend.
My concern is that the POC be written correctly so as not to create a basis for dismisal on a technicality.
I'd be so grateful for any guidance on:
• What details need to be captured within the 24 lines of the POC?
• Should this be written 3rd person? (eg 'claimant' and 'defendant' rather than first person)
• Would it make the claim stronger to include the list of ignored messages emails and calls in additional particulars or best not to worry about this and include them as part of a witness statement if contested? (They are all included in the letter before action already.)
• Any other gotchas I should be aware of when writing the POC?
Thank you so much.
(My friend is an 80 year old retiree in poor health with very limited savings trying to create some extra security for his wife in their final years and I feel so angry that he's been exploited in this way.)
I'm trying to assist a friend who has been screwed over by a planning consultant.
The man took £2,500 in fees up front to appeal a planning refusal decision. (This was agreed verbally but there are some text messages evidencing the agreement.)
After payment, it became clear that he was doing no work on the appeal and was ignoring all calls, messages and emails from my friend trying to discuss things.
In fact in the two months since taking payment there has not been a single conversation and the only contact from the consultant has been 4 text messages making excuses for why he hasnt been in touch and promising a call later that day or the next which never arrives.
With the deadline for the appeal approaching, my friend messaged him saying if he didnt hear from him with evidence of work done, he would take that to mean there was no intention of doing it and would be forced to hire someone else (to make sure it was submitted on time).
This is exactly what happened. The message was ignored and my friend engaged another agent to do the work (paying out another £3,000).
I helped him write a Letter Before Action laying out the situation, the number of ignored calls, the dates of messages and emails and requesting a return of the monies paid, and giving 14 days to respond.
The only response was a message (just beyond the 14 days) with more excuses (admitting he had done no work due to poor mental health) saying he could still get it done in time, and promising a full reply to the letter the next day (which of course never arrived).
I now want to submit a claim for the fees for my friend.
My concern is that the POC be written correctly so as not to create a basis for dismisal on a technicality.
I'd be so grateful for any guidance on:
• What details need to be captured within the 24 lines of the POC?
• Should this be written 3rd person? (eg 'claimant' and 'defendant' rather than first person)
• Would it make the claim stronger to include the list of ignored messages emails and calls in additional particulars or best not to worry about this and include them as part of a witness statement if contested? (They are all included in the letter before action already.)
• Any other gotchas I should be aware of when writing the POC?
Thank you so much.
(My friend is an 80 year old retiree in poor health with very limited savings trying to create some extra security for his wife in their final years and I feel so angry that he's been exploited in this way.)
Comment