I am a Claimant in a civil claim, submitted my claim and received a defence.
The Defence however did not comply with the CPRs form of Statement of Truth (SoT) and only had a half of the required wording.
The warning about making false statements was not included.
I applied to the court to strike out the defence, I suspected the foul play from the defendant's solicitors.
The judge agreed that the Statement of Truth was not compliant with CPR but dismissed my request for a strike-out saying that it was too harsh.
So the defence is left as it is and doesn't have the full SoT. I am surprised by that decision.
Can I make another application to order the defendant to amend his Claim and have the fully compliant SoT wording?
This is what I wanted from the start and I thought the judge would exercise his discretion to order the defendant just that, but he did not.
Thanks in advance.
The Defence however did not comply with the CPRs form of Statement of Truth (SoT) and only had a half of the required wording.
The warning about making false statements was not included.
I applied to the court to strike out the defence, I suspected the foul play from the defendant's solicitors.
The judge agreed that the Statement of Truth was not compliant with CPR but dismissed my request for a strike-out saying that it was too harsh.
So the defence is left as it is and doesn't have the full SoT. I am surprised by that decision.
Can I make another application to order the defendant to amend his Claim and have the fully compliant SoT wording?
This is what I wanted from the start and I thought the judge would exercise his discretion to order the defendant just that, but he did not.
Thanks in advance.
Comment