Hello all,
I am seeking some help, guidance and support in a building case. I am the Claimant, the Defendant is a ltd construction firm. The case pertains a wrongly and defectively installed bathroom. I brought the case to the small claims track, and just went through the preliminary hearing. In N180 I requested an expert witness, which was granted. I went through RICS and recruited a surveyor which the Defendant agreed on hiring. I am now in the process of having to write a letter of instruction but I find it difficult getting information on how to phrase, what to include etc. I have followed the threads of others on this forum which has been helpful, but I still have a number of questions.
1. The court asked us to include previous corresponding documents (letter before action, N9B etc.) accompanying the letter of instruction but did not specify or even mention the need for a Scott Schedule Note. Should I include such a document, or any other schedule? Admittedly, the documents I provided already contain itemised list of damages).
2. How long and detailed should the letter of instruction itself be?
3. Should the letter of instruction contain questions, if so how many is customary?
I would be really grateful if someone, more legally grounded, could send me a redacted letter as an example, as I feel a bit lost.
Thanks a billion!
I am seeking some help, guidance and support in a building case. I am the Claimant, the Defendant is a ltd construction firm. The case pertains a wrongly and defectively installed bathroom. I brought the case to the small claims track, and just went through the preliminary hearing. In N180 I requested an expert witness, which was granted. I went through RICS and recruited a surveyor which the Defendant agreed on hiring. I am now in the process of having to write a letter of instruction but I find it difficult getting information on how to phrase, what to include etc. I have followed the threads of others on this forum which has been helpful, but I still have a number of questions.
1. The court asked us to include previous corresponding documents (letter before action, N9B etc.) accompanying the letter of instruction but did not specify or even mention the need for a Scott Schedule Note. Should I include such a document, or any other schedule? Admittedly, the documents I provided already contain itemised list of damages).
2. How long and detailed should the letter of instruction itself be?
3. Should the letter of instruction contain questions, if so how many is customary?
I would be really grateful if someone, more legally grounded, could send me a redacted letter as an example, as I feel a bit lost.
Thanks a billion!
Comment