After I left a shop I was followed by staff and wrongly accused of shoplifting.
I filed a claim in Scotland after this wrongful shoplifting accusation under the Simple Procedure and I can attach a redacted version of my claim if required
The respondent has submitted a defence and the judge has arranged a court management conference but I don't understand the following written clarification I've been ordered to provide below;
'the respondent avers that the claimant denies that his claim is based on defamation. Does the claimant accept this? If not, why not and on what basis does the claimant say he is entitled to the sums claimed'
Please can someone clarify what this means and how to respond
I filed a claim in Scotland after this wrongful shoplifting accusation under the Simple Procedure and I can attach a redacted version of my claim if required
The respondent has submitted a defence and the judge has arranged a court management conference but I don't understand the following written clarification I've been ordered to provide below;
'the respondent avers that the claimant denies that his claim is based on defamation. Does the claimant accept this? If not, why not and on what basis does the claimant say he is entitled to the sums claimed'
Please can someone clarify what this means and how to respond
Comment