Tweet
Hi there,
This is my first post although I have been lurking for a while
I had court papers issued by Lantern MMF for an old Quick Quid loan, which I defended with bank statements etc. The case was set for 27th Nov, I was unable to attend. I followed all protocols and deadlines, sent my defence in 14 days in advance and let the judge know I wouldn’t be attending and that they could hear in my absence etc. All well and good.
The date passes, didn’t hear anything. About 16th Dec I got a very brief letter which at the time I thought said it had been dismissed. Woohoo I thought, and binned the letter .
18th Jan I received a letter saying that on the 16th Jan they ordered that the car on 27th Nov has been set aside and would be heard on 1st March! I didn’t understand what this meant so I emailed the court saying I didn’t understand, and that I thought this had all been dealt with.
Today I got an equally confusing reply, which read:
We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 18th Jan, which was referred to the District Judge who made the following comments:
“The order of Jan 16th 19 explains that the order of 27th Nov 18 has been set aside. It also explains why “Upon the claimant having made the request for the matter to be dealt with upon the papers as received by the court on 6th Nov 18”. The matter will not be dealt with on March 1st.”
Yours Sincerely
Notice how this reply says the matter will NOT be dealt with on March 1st?!!
I don’t have a clue what any of this means! Can anyone please explain? Thank you in advance
This is my first post although I have been lurking for a while
I had court papers issued by Lantern MMF for an old Quick Quid loan, which I defended with bank statements etc. The case was set for 27th Nov, I was unable to attend. I followed all protocols and deadlines, sent my defence in 14 days in advance and let the judge know I wouldn’t be attending and that they could hear in my absence etc. All well and good.
The date passes, didn’t hear anything. About 16th Dec I got a very brief letter which at the time I thought said it had been dismissed. Woohoo I thought, and binned the letter .
18th Jan I received a letter saying that on the 16th Jan they ordered that the car on 27th Nov has been set aside and would be heard on 1st March! I didn’t understand what this meant so I emailed the court saying I didn’t understand, and that I thought this had all been dealt with.
Today I got an equally confusing reply, which read:
We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 18th Jan, which was referred to the District Judge who made the following comments:
“The order of Jan 16th 19 explains that the order of 27th Nov 18 has been set aside. It also explains why “Upon the claimant having made the request for the matter to be dealt with upon the papers as received by the court on 6th Nov 18”. The matter will not be dealt with on March 1st.”
Yours Sincerely
Notice how this reply says the matter will NOT be dealt with on March 1st?!!
I don’t have a clue what any of this means! Can anyone please explain? Thank you in advance
