Hi Everyone
Just looking for some help on a court case involving restons solicitors...
Basic backround is:
- Rececvied letters from Restons late last year regarding a client which claimed I owed them £10K+
- After many letters requesting proof, the claimant claimed no documents existed as it related to an over draft account
- Court claim filed with the NBCC
- CPR31.14 request letter ignored, still claiming no documents existed
-Defendant filed a defence on the basis that no documents existed, and the claimant should produce the documents
-Claimant failed to respond in time to produce documents, court case became stayed
- Recently, claimant has forwarded what they claim to be a credit agreement and state it is a loan and stating unless I accept liabilty in 7 days they will apply for a summary judgement against me
So.....I was ok with handling this until it became less straight forward. I am a bit confused to what the next step should be and my questions are:
Are they allowed to seek a summary judgement even though their claim has changed i.e claiming it was a overdraft and not a loan?
Do i need to contact the courts and change my defense on the basis the claimant seems to have changed their claim?
Just looking for some help on a court case involving restons solicitors...
Basic backround is:
- Rececvied letters from Restons late last year regarding a client which claimed I owed them £10K+
- After many letters requesting proof, the claimant claimed no documents existed as it related to an over draft account
- Court claim filed with the NBCC
- CPR31.14 request letter ignored, still claiming no documents existed
-Defendant filed a defence on the basis that no documents existed, and the claimant should produce the documents
-Claimant failed to respond in time to produce documents, court case became stayed
- Recently, claimant has forwarded what they claim to be a credit agreement and state it is a loan and stating unless I accept liabilty in 7 days they will apply for a summary judgement against me
So.....I was ok with handling this until it became less straight forward. I am a bit confused to what the next step should be and my questions are:
Are they allowed to seek a summary judgement even though their claim has changed i.e claiming it was a overdraft and not a loan?
Do i need to contact the courts and change my defense on the basis the claimant seems to have changed their claim?
Comment