Re: CCJ Received without knowledge - Help required
Sorry busy over the weekend, not much of a chance to respond.
First of all, not sure why they would prepare to dismiss the application if they are already consenting to set aside? You should agree but at the end of the day they should be paying your costs, if your application is granted you probably would be entitled to costs of the application anyway, they are just trying to fumble out of paying for your application costs. If you believe it is statute barred then you could explain to them you are confident the application will be set aside because you received no court papers and at the time of the claim being made you know that it was statute barred. where you have proof or evidence to show that your defence has a chance of success the court should grant it and statute barred is a very valid defence. I am not sure why Wright Hassall would want to dismiss an application where the claim was already statute barred and waste further costs.
I've uploaded a template consent order you could fill in and send to them today. The first paragraph says the consent order is in full and final settlement and prevents them from bringing any further claims against you in respect of this matter. The following 3 bullet points are self explanatory but just note point 2, it says the claim shall be withdrawn, this is because when you set aside the judgment it usually gets referred back to court for another hearing.
If you don't wish to use the first paragraph you could just say instead "UPON the Claimant and Defendant having agreed to the following terms". Sign it and email it off to them and see what they say, as I said above if you notify them that you are aware the claim is statute barred which is a reasonable chance of success and to avoid further costs you agree to the consent order attached. You should also inform them that you do not understand why they are agreeing to consent but refusing to pay application fees which are likely to be reclaimed if the application is successful. I expect them to reject the consent order but worth a shot and you should insist on recovering your application fees, but its your choice whether you wish to or not.
Note I am not sure whether you have named yourself as the claimant for the set aside and if you havn't then you will need to change points 2 and 3 to the Defendant.
Or you could agree to their order and suggest you want your application fees back
Sorry busy over the weekend, not much of a chance to respond.
First of all, not sure why they would prepare to dismiss the application if they are already consenting to set aside? You should agree but at the end of the day they should be paying your costs, if your application is granted you probably would be entitled to costs of the application anyway, they are just trying to fumble out of paying for your application costs. If you believe it is statute barred then you could explain to them you are confident the application will be set aside because you received no court papers and at the time of the claim being made you know that it was statute barred. where you have proof or evidence to show that your defence has a chance of success the court should grant it and statute barred is a very valid defence. I am not sure why Wright Hassall would want to dismiss an application where the claim was already statute barred and waste further costs.
I've uploaded a template consent order you could fill in and send to them today. The first paragraph says the consent order is in full and final settlement and prevents them from bringing any further claims against you in respect of this matter. The following 3 bullet points are self explanatory but just note point 2, it says the claim shall be withdrawn, this is because when you set aside the judgment it usually gets referred back to court for another hearing.
If you don't wish to use the first paragraph you could just say instead "UPON the Claimant and Defendant having agreed to the following terms". Sign it and email it off to them and see what they say, as I said above if you notify them that you are aware the claim is statute barred which is a reasonable chance of success and to avoid further costs you agree to the consent order attached. You should also inform them that you do not understand why they are agreeing to consent but refusing to pay application fees which are likely to be reclaimed if the application is successful. I expect them to reject the consent order but worth a shot and you should insist on recovering your application fees, but its your choice whether you wish to or not.
Note I am not sure whether you have named yourself as the claimant for the set aside and if you havn't then you will need to change points 2 and 3 to the Defendant.
Or you could agree to their order and suggest you want your application fees back
Comment