Hello everyone,
I'm a newbie here but was recommended to shuffle across by the guys on MSE for some much needed advice
I received a Claim Form this morning in relation to BlackHorse via Lowell / Bryan Carter.
Firstly, I have not at any point acknowledged the debt.
Secondly, I know this is probably not valid - but the default date was issued by BlackHorse. Lowell / Bryan Carter have 'lied'? on the claim form in relation to a default date they issued. My belief is that this is not possible, right?
Thirdly, I have never engaged with the DCA nor Carters until I sent a letter in March in response to their claim - my stance at that point was Section 5 of the limitation act (which in hindsight was a little presumptuous). I effectively got a response from this stating they were investigating but believed the debt to not be statute barred. I'm guessing they are right but surely point 2 above has some substance as it is a false statement??
Fourthly, I haven't requested (maybe I should) an original copy of the agreement - is this something I should pursue?
I guess more importantly - any prescribed actions that anyone can recommend I will undertake. I intend to extend via online Moneyclaim to allow me 28 days.
IMO seems the debt is enforceable IF the dates of default issue is not valid - if that is a no-go, should - where should I be directing this?
I will repost what I posted on MSE for the background below:
"Black Horse agreement.
The car was handed back.
The amount Black Horse requested to settle after they auctioned the car was in dispute and never resolved.
Black Horse issued and then applied a default notice to my credit file dated XX/XX/2010.
The debt was then sold to Lowell.
The Blackhorse default notice disappeared from my credit file.
All quiet until 2013 - Lowell slap a marker on my credit file for the disputed amount with Blackhorse.
I do not enter into communication with them whatsoever.
It trundles along and nothing..........until recently.
I received a letter from Bryan Carters who are "acting" on behalf of Lowells.
Being a little presumptuous, I decided to engage and requested 'they prove it' and additionally I questioned validity from a statute barred standpoint.
I received a response which effectively stated they would enquire with 'their client aka Lowells'. The trail went dead (not really surprised).
This morning I have received a Claim Form with the claimant as Lowells with reference to Bryan Carter as documentation and payment reference below the claimant details.
My belief that the debt was/is statute barred is IMO incorrect.....I don't dispute that 'an amount' was owed to Black Horse (original creditor) but it was not the amount they claimed and they failed to respond to my requests to rectify or discuss. This is why this situation has arisen.
Questions:
1. Firstly I have just reviewed both the court form and my credit report both of which state a default date of XX/XX/11 by Lowells. Remember that Black Horse had already issued a default XX/XX/2010.
My belief is that a default date cannot be changed once a creditor has issued and even if the debt has been sold - am I right?
Does this simple fact give me an angle?
2. I have never received an original copy of my agreement as per request to Bryan Carter acting on behalf of Lowells
Is this not another angle for attack?
3. Putting aside the above points, what other angles are available to me?
I intend to defend fully but wanted to see if the DCA has tripped the whole proceedings up before we have even got started?"
Thanks all
I'm a newbie here but was recommended to shuffle across by the guys on MSE for some much needed advice
I received a Claim Form this morning in relation to BlackHorse via Lowell / Bryan Carter.
Firstly, I have not at any point acknowledged the debt.
Secondly, I know this is probably not valid - but the default date was issued by BlackHorse. Lowell / Bryan Carter have 'lied'? on the claim form in relation to a default date they issued. My belief is that this is not possible, right?
Thirdly, I have never engaged with the DCA nor Carters until I sent a letter in March in response to their claim - my stance at that point was Section 5 of the limitation act (which in hindsight was a little presumptuous). I effectively got a response from this stating they were investigating but believed the debt to not be statute barred. I'm guessing they are right but surely point 2 above has some substance as it is a false statement??
Fourthly, I haven't requested (maybe I should) an original copy of the agreement - is this something I should pursue?
I guess more importantly - any prescribed actions that anyone can recommend I will undertake. I intend to extend via online Moneyclaim to allow me 28 days.
IMO seems the debt is enforceable IF the dates of default issue is not valid - if that is a no-go, should - where should I be directing this?
I will repost what I posted on MSE for the background below:
"Black Horse agreement.
The car was handed back.
The amount Black Horse requested to settle after they auctioned the car was in dispute and never resolved.
Black Horse issued and then applied a default notice to my credit file dated XX/XX/2010.
The debt was then sold to Lowell.
The Blackhorse default notice disappeared from my credit file.
All quiet until 2013 - Lowell slap a marker on my credit file for the disputed amount with Blackhorse.
I do not enter into communication with them whatsoever.
It trundles along and nothing..........until recently.
I received a letter from Bryan Carters who are "acting" on behalf of Lowells.
Being a little presumptuous, I decided to engage and requested 'they prove it' and additionally I questioned validity from a statute barred standpoint.
I received a response which effectively stated they would enquire with 'their client aka Lowells'. The trail went dead (not really surprised).
This morning I have received a Claim Form with the claimant as Lowells with reference to Bryan Carter as documentation and payment reference below the claimant details.
My belief that the debt was/is statute barred is IMO incorrect.....I don't dispute that 'an amount' was owed to Black Horse (original creditor) but it was not the amount they claimed and they failed to respond to my requests to rectify or discuss. This is why this situation has arisen.
Questions:
1. Firstly I have just reviewed both the court form and my credit report both of which state a default date of XX/XX/11 by Lowells. Remember that Black Horse had already issued a default XX/XX/2010.
My belief is that a default date cannot be changed once a creditor has issued and even if the debt has been sold - am I right?
Does this simple fact give me an angle?
2. I have never received an original copy of my agreement as per request to Bryan Carter acting on behalf of Lowells
Is this not another angle for attack?
3. Putting aside the above points, what other angles are available to me?
I intend to defend fully but wanted to see if the DCA has tripped the whole proceedings up before we have even got started?"
Thanks all
Comment