Re: Mortimer clarke saying agreement of termination date is acknowledgement
Ok a Little research has One SRA registered Manager.
Let's give him a nudge.
Mr Richard E Mathias
Manger
Mortimer Clarke Solicitors Ltd
3rd Floor
16- 22 Grafton Road
Worthing
West Sussex
BN11 1QP
Date........................
Ref: use theirs.
Re: Statute Barred ( Alleged Debt)
Dear Mr Mathias,
This is a letter of complaint regarding an alleged debt for £... .. arising from an account with xxxxx which I have stated is statute barred under section 5 of The Limitation Act 1980.
I confirm my position on this matter.
Since I first informed Mortimer Clarke Ltd., of the status of the alleged your staff have " come up with" various misguided claims that the alleged debt is not statute barred in order to mislead me into either admitting liability and or making payments.
The reference to the BMW Finance Ltd - v Hart Appeal Court Judgement has been misinterpreted and used to attempt to deny the status of the alleged debt.
I am sure you are aware that a termination of such as an account as this is Not an acknowledge of liability and has no merit.
Their Lordships In BMW - v - Hart found that the date that the creditor was first permitted to demand payment in full was the the start of the relevant 6 year period specified in s.5 of LA 1980.
The claims that various payments of fees / charges applied to the account and thus the alleged debt is not statute barred are also of no merit.
I suggest that Mortimer Clarke Ltd., now withdraws its claim immediately and confirms in writing that it has done so within 7 working days of the date hereon.
Therefore the alleged debt is clearly statute barred, and I will not make any payments in regard to the alleged debt.
Use signed for post, check delivery date.
nem
Ok a Little research has One SRA registered Manager.
Let's give him a nudge.
Mr Richard E Mathias
Manger
Mortimer Clarke Solicitors Ltd
3rd Floor
16- 22 Grafton Road
Worthing
West Sussex
BN11 1QP
Date........................
Ref: use theirs.
Re: Statute Barred ( Alleged Debt)
Dear Mr Mathias,
This is a letter of complaint regarding an alleged debt for £... .. arising from an account with xxxxx which I have stated is statute barred under section 5 of The Limitation Act 1980.
I confirm my position on this matter.
Since I first informed Mortimer Clarke Ltd., of the status of the alleged your staff have " come up with" various misguided claims that the alleged debt is not statute barred in order to mislead me into either admitting liability and or making payments.
The reference to the BMW Finance Ltd - v Hart Appeal Court Judgement has been misinterpreted and used to attempt to deny the status of the alleged debt.
I am sure you are aware that a termination of such as an account as this is Not an acknowledge of liability and has no merit.
Their Lordships In BMW - v - Hart found that the date that the creditor was first permitted to demand payment in full was the the start of the relevant 6 year period specified in s.5 of LA 1980.
The claims that various payments of fees / charges applied to the account and thus the alleged debt is not statute barred are also of no merit.
I suggest that Mortimer Clarke Ltd., now withdraws its claim immediately and confirms in writing that it has done so within 7 working days of the date hereon.
Therefore the alleged debt is clearly statute barred, and I will not make any payments in regard to the alleged debt.
Use signed for post, check delivery date.
nem
Comment