Re: Court Claim - Lowell / halifax - 20-1-2015
[QUOTE=FlamingParrot;523911]It's most certainly worth a try, you can submit it online. Default judgment has to be requested by the claimant, they may not have got round to doing it yet. ray: In that case, it sounds like they may not have twigged it! ray:
Most certainly! SBd is an ABSOLUTE DEFENCE, the best there is! :grin:
See below for a potential defence, adapted from this post: http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...658#post453658 That one covers both the SBd angle and the lack of documents produced by the claimant. You'll need to amend it to suit.1.
1. The Claimant's claim was issued on 20th January 2015.
2. The Defendant contends that as this is a claim in contract and an excess of 6 years have passed since any cause of action may have accrued, any alleged debt is therefore statute barred pursuant to section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980.
3. The Defendant made a formal request for a copy of the original agreement under section 78(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 on 9th February 2015. The Claimant did not respond. While the default of the request continues the claimants is unable to enforce the debt pursuant to s 78(6) on the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
4. The Defendant made a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the Statement of Case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 on 12TH Februaryn2015 which was delivered and signed for by the Claimants solicitor on 13th February 2015. As of 2nd March 2015 no information has been received.
5. The Defendant contends the Claimant should have the documents on which he intends to rely in his claim before commencement of proceedings
6. The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £1398.94 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.
Hey guys this is the defence (thank you FlamingParrot:tung Do you think this would be okay...???
Seems to be having problems with royal mail now They can only give proof of signature for the CPR but not for the letter I about the account being SBd or the one For Lowell requesting a copy of agreement.... (say I can put in a claim after the 4th march ....dont suppose they claim will cover £1398.94 worth of debt)
Soooo.... is it still okay to go ahead with this defence???
Because I have not heard from Carter about SBd or from Lowells will i have to write to them again (no signature no proof) (doesn't rain it pours).
Lastly what happens if the put a judgement against me (so to sound so dumb ...what does it all mean?)
Just spoke to the courts .... no judgement has been entered as yet, they will accept my defence if done on line by 4.00pm today
all advice will be most appreciated... panicking now... please help
[QUOTE=FlamingParrot;523911]It's most certainly worth a try, you can submit it online. Default judgment has to be requested by the claimant, they may not have got round to doing it yet. ray: In that case, it sounds like they may not have twigged it! ray:
Most certainly! SBd is an ABSOLUTE DEFENCE, the best there is! :grin:
See below for a potential defence, adapted from this post: http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...658#post453658 That one covers both the SBd angle and the lack of documents produced by the claimant. You'll need to amend it to suit.1.
1. The Claimant's claim was issued on 20th January 2015.
2. The Defendant contends that as this is a claim in contract and an excess of 6 years have passed since any cause of action may have accrued, any alleged debt is therefore statute barred pursuant to section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980.
3. The Defendant made a formal request for a copy of the original agreement under section 78(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 on 9th February 2015. The Claimant did not respond. While the default of the request continues the claimants is unable to enforce the debt pursuant to s 78(6) on the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
4. The Defendant made a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the Statement of Case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 on 12TH Februaryn2015 which was delivered and signed for by the Claimants solicitor on 13th February 2015. As of 2nd March 2015 no information has been received.
5. The Defendant contends the Claimant should have the documents on which he intends to rely in his claim before commencement of proceedings
6. The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £1398.94 or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.
Hey guys this is the defence (thank you FlamingParrot:tung Do you think this would be okay...???
Seems to be having problems with royal mail now They can only give proof of signature for the CPR but not for the letter I about the account being SBd or the one For Lowell requesting a copy of agreement.... (say I can put in a claim after the 4th march ....dont suppose they claim will cover £1398.94 worth of debt)
Soooo.... is it still okay to go ahead with this defence???
Because I have not heard from Carter about SBd or from Lowells will i have to write to them again (no signature no proof) (doesn't rain it pours).
Lastly what happens if the put a judgement against me (so to sound so dumb ...what does it all mean?)
Just spoke to the courts .... no judgement has been entered as yet, they will accept my defence if done on line by 4.00pm today
all advice will be most appreciated... panicking now... please help
Comment