Good afternoon,
I recently received contact from a person I sold a car to (privately) at the beginning of the year, asking for my address. After about 5-6 messages claiming he wanted to pass a letter on to me, he finally tells me he has obtained a judgement against me and needed to provide the Bailiff's he has instructed with an address.
This started shortly after I sold the car to him, when he claimed he was not happy with the car. Out of goodwill, I attempted to negotiate with him, but he would accept nothing less than a full refund. Eventually, I told him I was not willing to offer a full refund and eventually the emails stopped.
It seems he found a very old address of mine and entered a small claim against me at that address, for the full purchase price of the car, which he was obviously granted by default (In June) because I was not given the opportunity to defend it.
I have been in contact with the court, who have not given me much information on the claim but have advised me I need to make two applications; one to have the claim set aside and the other to stay the writ - carrying a fee of £155 each.
I am waiting for an appointment with my local CAB, but I fear that may not be soon enough if the Bailiff were to find my new address.
So I was hoping to get the advice of people more knowledgable than me, here;
Do I really need to apply for both? Would the writ still be valid if the Judgement was set aside?
The N244 form is very ambiguous, can anyone advise how I should fill out the form for each application, if they are indeed both needed?
The claimant has expressed an interest in obtaining my address from any application I make, no doubt to instruct his bailiff - can he do this?
£310 is quite a lot of money. From reading the EX160A, I may be entitled to a part remission on the basis that I do not have disposable capital over £3k and my gross household income is under £5,490 - However, I'm concerned applying for such remission may add unnecessary delays.
Are the fees incurred reclaimable if I'm successful in defending the claim? If so, perhaps the previous point is not such a concern.
Any help would be most appreciated.
I recently received contact from a person I sold a car to (privately) at the beginning of the year, asking for my address. After about 5-6 messages claiming he wanted to pass a letter on to me, he finally tells me he has obtained a judgement against me and needed to provide the Bailiff's he has instructed with an address.
This started shortly after I sold the car to him, when he claimed he was not happy with the car. Out of goodwill, I attempted to negotiate with him, but he would accept nothing less than a full refund. Eventually, I told him I was not willing to offer a full refund and eventually the emails stopped.
It seems he found a very old address of mine and entered a small claim against me at that address, for the full purchase price of the car, which he was obviously granted by default (In June) because I was not given the opportunity to defend it.
I have been in contact with the court, who have not given me much information on the claim but have advised me I need to make two applications; one to have the claim set aside and the other to stay the writ - carrying a fee of £155 each.
I am waiting for an appointment with my local CAB, but I fear that may not be soon enough if the Bailiff were to find my new address.
So I was hoping to get the advice of people more knowledgable than me, here;
Do I really need to apply for both? Would the writ still be valid if the Judgement was set aside?
The N244 form is very ambiguous, can anyone advise how I should fill out the form for each application, if they are indeed both needed?
The claimant has expressed an interest in obtaining my address from any application I make, no doubt to instruct his bailiff - can he do this?
£310 is quite a lot of money. From reading the EX160A, I may be entitled to a part remission on the basis that I do not have disposable capital over £3k and my gross household income is under £5,490 - However, I'm concerned applying for such remission may add unnecessary delays.
Are the fees incurred reclaimable if I'm successful in defending the claim? If so, perhaps the previous point is not such a concern.
Any help would be most appreciated.
Comment