Re: Bryan Carter/Lowell/Capital One - Continuation of previous posts
Okay they look like they are from late 99 early 2000 as they refer to the interest rate up to and from August 2000 being 17.9%. V2a says the same.
Para 10 margin of 10.17% on V3# - 10.66% on v2a
Couple other minor interest rate differences
v3# they have added in a clause - clause 12 Payment Protection Insurance - that isn't on V2a
That would explain the move of the 'use of information clause' from para 22 to para 23
There's no box on the front of your signed page for ticking PPI, but your signed page right hand side black box panel has an extra line under the % rate
, so could be right, as it has changed and as we can't see it well enough to check the Para 22 / 23 bit I don't think that's strong enough to evidence those are not the right reconstruction.
Bugger.
Okay they look like they are from late 99 early 2000 as they refer to the interest rate up to and from August 2000 being 17.9%. V2a says the same.
Para 10 margin of 10.17% on V3# - 10.66% on v2a
Couple other minor interest rate differences
v3# they have added in a clause - clause 12 Payment Protection Insurance - that isn't on V2a
That would explain the move of the 'use of information clause' from para 22 to para 23
There's no box on the front of your signed page for ticking PPI, but your signed page right hand side black box panel has an extra line under the % rate
, so could be right, as it has changed and as we can't see it well enough to check the Para 22 / 23 bit I don't think that's strong enough to evidence those are not the right reconstruction.
Bugger.
Comment