Re: Need help with a court claim please
I'm going to quote below what PT2537 has written elsewhere on the subject of embarrassed defences and holding defences:
It is important that if you can prepare a defence then you do so. It is also equally important in my view that you use the rules to secure the information that is necessary for you to be able to prepare a defence to the Claim.
Now just to qualify a point, if the claim is for money relating to for example a debt that you never had ie they got the wrong person, then you would put forward a simple bare denial as the debt isnt yours, however, if in 1993 you took out an MBNA card and you know it was assigned to 3 different companys over the time and now the Claimant is suing you for that debt, it is foolish in my view to say i dont know about this debt as you would be lying, if you want to however challenge the assignment say then you can say you admit entering into an agreement with MBNA or Barclays but you deny that it has been lawfully assigned to the current claimant, that is of course if you do not have proof of the assignment to the current claimant and genuinely havent been served with the correct papers etc. The single most important thing NOT TO DO is LIE, you must be honest and truthful.
The biggest problem that litigants in person seem to face is that they request a copy of say the agreement mentioned in the Claim form, and the Default notice and the Claimant fails to provide copies within the 7 days which rule 31.15 provides. In these circumstances it seems normal for people to file a "embarrassed Defence" which basically argues the Defendant is embarrassed at pleading because no documents have been provided and for leave to amend the defence later.
There is the option for the Defendant where the Claimant is in-breach of the provisions of CPR rule 31.14 & 31.15 to make an application on an N244 form. Now then, you should exhaust all options before launching an application, it should be last resort not first. Let the creditor have the 7 days he is allowed. On day 8 write to him pointing out the time is slipping and that you require disclosure, ask for an estimate of when the documents will be provided. Dont be frightened to give the creditor a time frame. Say "I require the agreement by 4pm on xxxxxx 2012 or i will have no choice but to make an application to the Court" it will assist if the application is necessary.
Do not allow the time for filing your defence to expire. If you have asked for an extension using CPR Rule 15.5 and that is about to expire, then an application to extend the time frame is important otherwise you will face default judgment and may be faced with a bar on your ability to file a defence.
Originally posted by Gorang
View Post
Ok so you have decided to defend the claim. Firstly,lets look at holding defences as they are some times called. The Whitebook has a very helpful piece on holding Defences. It states
So if you file a holding defence instead of pleading your defence properly then you will be putting yourself at risk of an application from the Claimant to strike out your Defence or you may find the Court makes an order of its own motion and strikes you out.
15.5.3
Holding defence
A defendant cannot legitimately obtain more time for preparing their defence by filing the so-called “holding defence” such as “I deny this debt: full defence to follow”. Such a defence does not comply with Pt 16 (contents of defence). A defencewhich consists of a bare denial
may be struck out under r.3.4 (see Practice Direction supplementing r.3.4 , para.1.6, see above para.3PD.1). Indeed on the filing of such a defence a court officer may refer it to a judge and the court may strike it out on its own initiative (see rr.3.2 and 3.3 ).
Holding defence
A defendant cannot legitimately obtain more time for preparing their defence by filing the so-called “holding defence” such as “I deny this debt: full defence to follow”. Such a defence does not comply with Pt 16 (contents of defence). A defencewhich consists of a bare denial
may be struck out under r.3.4 (see Practice Direction supplementing r.3.4 , para.1.6, see above para.3PD.1). Indeed on the filing of such a defence a court officer may refer it to a judge and the court may strike it out on its own initiative (see rr.3.2 and 3.3 ).
It is important that if you can prepare a defence then you do so. It is also equally important in my view that you use the rules to secure the information that is necessary for you to be able to prepare a defence to the Claim.
Now just to qualify a point, if the claim is for money relating to for example a debt that you never had ie they got the wrong person, then you would put forward a simple bare denial as the debt isnt yours, however, if in 1993 you took out an MBNA card and you know it was assigned to 3 different companys over the time and now the Claimant is suing you for that debt, it is foolish in my view to say i dont know about this debt as you would be lying, if you want to however challenge the assignment say then you can say you admit entering into an agreement with MBNA or Barclays but you deny that it has been lawfully assigned to the current claimant, that is of course if you do not have proof of the assignment to the current claimant and genuinely havent been served with the correct papers etc. The single most important thing NOT TO DO is LIE, you must be honest and truthful.
The biggest problem that litigants in person seem to face is that they request a copy of say the agreement mentioned in the Claim form, and the Default notice and the Claimant fails to provide copies within the 7 days which rule 31.15 provides. In these circumstances it seems normal for people to file a "embarrassed Defence" which basically argues the Defendant is embarrassed at pleading because no documents have been provided and for leave to amend the defence later.
There is the option for the Defendant where the Claimant is in-breach of the provisions of CPR rule 31.14 & 31.15 to make an application on an N244 form. Now then, you should exhaust all options before launching an application, it should be last resort not first. Let the creditor have the 7 days he is allowed. On day 8 write to him pointing out the time is slipping and that you require disclosure, ask for an estimate of when the documents will be provided. Dont be frightened to give the creditor a time frame. Say "I require the agreement by 4pm on xxxxxx 2012 or i will have no choice but to make an application to the Court" it will assist if the application is necessary.
Do not allow the time for filing your defence to expire. If you have asked for an extension using CPR Rule 15.5 and that is about to expire, then an application to extend the time frame is important otherwise you will face default judgment and may be faced with a bar on your ability to file a defence.
Comment