Re: Help! Confused with letter from Court Re: Debt
"1. The claim is for the sum of 2015.41 in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with Britannica Recoveries S. r.l Atlas under account number xxxxxxxxxx upon which the defendant failed to maintain payments.
2. A default notice was served upon the defendant and has not been complied with.
3. By virtue of a sale agreement between Britannia Recoveries S. r.l Atlas and the claimant, the claim vested in the claimant who has genuine commercial interest. The defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter."
OK, so they still haven't supplied a copy of the agreement or default notice. Indeed in their amended PoC, they have downplayed the whole default notice 'description'.
I would whack in an immediate CPR 31.14 request for them to disclose the agreement and default notice. However, given that you have until only 24th September to submit a defence, then one needs to be prepared because as things stand, they are stuffed if they plan to rely on their current evidence.
"1. The claim is for the sum of 2015.41 in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with Britannica Recoveries S. r.l Atlas under account number xxxxxxxxxx upon which the defendant failed to maintain payments.
2. A default notice was served upon the defendant and has not been complied with.
3. By virtue of a sale agreement between Britannia Recoveries S. r.l Atlas and the claimant, the claim vested in the claimant who has genuine commercial interest. The defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter."
OK, so they still haven't supplied a copy of the agreement or default notice. Indeed in their amended PoC, they have downplayed the whole default notice 'description'.
I would whack in an immediate CPR 31.14 request for them to disclose the agreement and default notice. However, given that you have until only 24th September to submit a defence, then one needs to be prepared because as things stand, they are stuffed if they plan to rely on their current evidence.
Comment