In 2009 voluntary liquidators came in to our business (lets call it A) because the company we worked with for 15 years (lets call them B) restructured and we were not part of their plans. company A bought £15,000 worth of shares in company B 15 years ago when B had a turn over of £1,000 000.
The liquidators were told about these company assets but said "they will complicate things just leave them" Company B still has those shares. Today company B has a turnover of £58,000 000 and is one of the top 100 companies in the uk.
The liquidators have been taking us to court for posession of our home for a debt of £22,000. Both the liquidators named on the court papers ceased to be voluntary liquidators in 2010 and 2011 my argument is
1. They should have gone after the company assets which must be worth A LOT today. They did not do their job properly so they don't deserve £22,000. I have offered £50 per week for now but their solicitors said they would laugh in my face.
I went o court to ask for a variation order. The judge said £50 month. The next day the liquidators (who were no longer liquidators) applied for an overturn on the variation order and the same day asked for a forced sale.
These were heard two days apart by two judges the first who gave the variation order asked for more information. The second gave them £50 per week for 4 weeks and a date to go back to decide if he will give them our house.
2. How can people who are no longer liquidators still be giving instruction as liquidators ( the second judge would not even listen he said those people just want their money.
3. Their solicitors know full well that the people instructing them are no longer liquidators.
Phew! I think that is everything please could you tell me what you think as I have paid thousands to solicitors who have just asked me for information to give to the other side.
Kind regards
Jillypompom
I'm sorry I don't know what a tag is. If anyone finds this message somewhere it shouldn't be please send it to the right place Thank you x
The liquidators were told about these company assets but said "they will complicate things just leave them" Company B still has those shares. Today company B has a turnover of £58,000 000 and is one of the top 100 companies in the uk.
The liquidators have been taking us to court for posession of our home for a debt of £22,000. Both the liquidators named on the court papers ceased to be voluntary liquidators in 2010 and 2011 my argument is
1. They should have gone after the company assets which must be worth A LOT today. They did not do their job properly so they don't deserve £22,000. I have offered £50 per week for now but their solicitors said they would laugh in my face.
I went o court to ask for a variation order. The judge said £50 month. The next day the liquidators (who were no longer liquidators) applied for an overturn on the variation order and the same day asked for a forced sale.
These were heard two days apart by two judges the first who gave the variation order asked for more information. The second gave them £50 per week for 4 weeks and a date to go back to decide if he will give them our house.
2. How can people who are no longer liquidators still be giving instruction as liquidators ( the second judge would not even listen he said those people just want their money.
3. Their solicitors know full well that the people instructing them are no longer liquidators.
Phew! I think that is everything please could you tell me what you think as I have paid thousands to solicitors who have just asked me for information to give to the other side.
Kind regards
Jillypompom
I'm sorry I don't know what a tag is. If anyone finds this message somewhere it shouldn't be please send it to the right place Thank you x
Comment