Tweet
Hi everyone,
I'm at quite an advanced stage with Egg, CMC due in a little over 2 weeks.
I have been fighting this for many months now. Their claim is just under £25k and my latest shot at them was a SO application due to their (continued) non compliance with Orders for Directions i.e. wrong T & Cs, balance on POC not substantiated, faulty DN.
The other side have taken a great interest in my DN as it is all OK apart from that it is missing some (rather important) prescribed wording. At the top where it says 'Default Notice' their printer must have been having a bad day as it forgot to insert the words 'Served under S87(i) of the CCA 1974'.
I am aware of the short comings of this and all of the necessary regulations within the 1983 regs covering DNs/termination with which it does not comply.
My question is this - Has anybody else had such a DN from Egg? And have you defended on this basis?
Grateful for any thoughts.
M
I'm at quite an advanced stage with Egg, CMC due in a little over 2 weeks.
I have been fighting this for many months now. Their claim is just under £25k and my latest shot at them was a SO application due to their (continued) non compliance with Orders for Directions i.e. wrong T & Cs, balance on POC not substantiated, faulty DN.
The other side have taken a great interest in my DN as it is all OK apart from that it is missing some (rather important) prescribed wording. At the top where it says 'Default Notice' their printer must have been having a bad day as it forgot to insert the words 'Served under S87(i) of the CCA 1974'.
I am aware of the short comings of this and all of the necessary regulations within the 1983 regs covering DNs/termination with which it does not comply.
My question is this - Has anybody else had such a DN from Egg? And have you defended on this basis?
Grateful for any thoughts.
M
