I have been involved in a long-running (7 years!!) set of appeals by my ex in trying to extract historic additional child support payments from me.
One of her appeals went to the Upper Tribunal in May last year and her appeal was dismissed.
12 months later....flabbergasted to receive notification from HMCTS of a child support reforms appeal in less than 2 weeks time. No tier or specific purpose of hearing mentioned - generic template letter only.
Called HMCTS this morning and they have informed me that the UT decision was set aside - have received no communication whatsoever since the original UT decision. My understanding is that an application for set aside can be made within a month of the original decision where there is an alleged procedural irregularity in the proceedings.
I have now asked for the hearing in 2 weeks time to be delayed as I have no context for this whatsoever.
Questions this raises:
One of her appeals went to the Upper Tribunal in May last year and her appeal was dismissed.
12 months later....flabbergasted to receive notification from HMCTS of a child support reforms appeal in less than 2 weeks time. No tier or specific purpose of hearing mentioned - generic template letter only.
Called HMCTS this morning and they have informed me that the UT decision was set aside - have received no communication whatsoever since the original UT decision. My understanding is that an application for set aside can be made within a month of the original decision where there is an alleged procedural irregularity in the proceedings.
I have now asked for the hearing in 2 weeks time to be delayed as I have no context for this whatsoever.
Questions this raises:
- Should the UT have notified me of the application to set aside and could I have challenged this?
- Should the UT have written to me with their set aside decision?
- If they had written to me, would I have had the opportunity to challenge this?
- Once an application to set aside is granted, my understanding is that this effectively 'cancels' their original decision and the matter would then return to the UT for a new hearing and decision?
- Are there any grounds are open to me to challenge any of this as failing to inform me of these events relating to this case would e.g. constitute a procedural irregularity or not be in the interests of justice?
Comment