So I think para. 4/5 overlap a little bit - might be worth incorporating them together. Rest of it looks ok to me.
*
The Claimant alleges that the car has previously been in an accident and therefore the mileage is incorrect, but I fail to see the relevance of what that has to do with the car’s mileage. It does not automatically follow that because the vehicle may have been in accident - that the vehicle did not accrue the mileage as stated on the advert. The mileage stated on the advert was taken directly from the odometer. Furthermore, I have checked vehicle’s MOT history on https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/ which confirms that the last recorded mileage was 42,704 miles (with the rest of the mileage being accrued whilst in my possession). In addition to this, the HPI check that I done prior purchasing the car stated no mileage issues. The Claimant is required to prove by way of expert evidence the causal link between the car having been in an accident and the stated mileage.
*
Comment