Hello. Please help.
I applied for a judgment to be set aside as I didn't get the opportunity to defend my case as I was not living at my address at the time the papers were served. I struggled for months after that to get any kind of legal help and assistance. I thought that I was going to get some free help from a couple of organisations (as they lead me to believe) and then they left me in limbo for months and let me down.
A default judgment was then issued
I applied for a set aside and asked for it to be dealt with without a hearing - unfortunately the judge decided to set a hearing in person.
I also wrote to the claimants asking them if they would agree for it to be set aside and I would refer the judge to my letter re costs if they did not agree. I gave a time frame for them to give a definitive answer and they missed the deadline. In the N244 I stated I wanted to set it aside so I could defend my case. However, I eventually got a response form their solicitors (who I do not correspond with) setting out a Consent order, giving a deadline, and basically saying if I pay what they allege I owe, plus the cost of the draft order (over £100) then they agree to set aside. They state if I do not agree I will be liable for their costs to attend the hearing. I feel this is totally unfair and didn't even know they could do this. They now expect me to pay more and it puts me back in the same position as before, to pay the debt which I dispute and if I don't I have to pay even more money! I feel like I am being held to ransom here. They may aswell have said, we will punch you in the face and if you don't agree you will pay our costs. I am a litigant in person and cannot afford a solicitor as I am in receipt of benefits.
What I want to know is can they dictate this?
Isn't this up to the judge to decide if I should pay their legal costs, not the solicitor to decide?
I asked for it to be set aside without a hearing and the judge decided to have the hearing, not me.
I applied for a judgment to be set aside as I didn't get the opportunity to defend my case as I was not living at my address at the time the papers were served. I struggled for months after that to get any kind of legal help and assistance. I thought that I was going to get some free help from a couple of organisations (as they lead me to believe) and then they left me in limbo for months and let me down.
A default judgment was then issued
I applied for a set aside and asked for it to be dealt with without a hearing - unfortunately the judge decided to set a hearing in person.
I also wrote to the claimants asking them if they would agree for it to be set aside and I would refer the judge to my letter re costs if they did not agree. I gave a time frame for them to give a definitive answer and they missed the deadline. In the N244 I stated I wanted to set it aside so I could defend my case. However, I eventually got a response form their solicitors (who I do not correspond with) setting out a Consent order, giving a deadline, and basically saying if I pay what they allege I owe, plus the cost of the draft order (over £100) then they agree to set aside. They state if I do not agree I will be liable for their costs to attend the hearing. I feel this is totally unfair and didn't even know they could do this. They now expect me to pay more and it puts me back in the same position as before, to pay the debt which I dispute and if I don't I have to pay even more money! I feel like I am being held to ransom here. They may aswell have said, we will punch you in the face and if you don't agree you will pay our costs. I am a litigant in person and cannot afford a solicitor as I am in receipt of benefits.
What I want to know is can they dictate this?
Isn't this up to the judge to decide if I should pay their legal costs, not the solicitor to decide?
I asked for it to be set aside without a hearing and the judge decided to have the hearing, not me.
Comment