Hi, I am being chased by PRA Group for a credit card debt. I sent off all the forms asking for documents to be provided and heard nothing. I advised the court of this as they were suggesting mediation but agreed it wouldn’t be suitable as I didn’t have the required info. The case was then sent to my local court via the small claims track. PRA Group were told to provide a defence, presumably because they hadn’t provided anything I asked for and this has just arrived. I’m not really sure what I’m looking at though as they have provided lots of statements that I didn’t request and almost 200 pages to go through.
There is a couple of forms at the beginning which outline the case, however, I’m referred to as a ‘she’ and I’m a ‘he’ (I don’t know if this matters). The other details are correct. This form basically tells the court what the documents are that have been submitted and acts as a glossary.
There is a credit agreement with all the terms. It has a letter on the front from my original creditor which suggests a copy of the CCA was sent when I originally requested it, making it look like I’m dragging this out unnecessarily but I didn’t receive anything at the time. This is over a year ago. There is another letter with it which suggests the creditor sent the documents to PRA Group last year and not directly to me, so it appears they didn’t send this on to me.
They have provided what they call a reconstituted credit agreement with basic terms and conditions and my name, but no date, signature or credit limit details (I don’t know if this is supposed to be part of it).
There are years worth of statements that I didn’t request, a copy of the default notice which is a photocopy. There is also a photocopy of the letter advising it was being transferred to PRA Group, a letter to confirm they have bought the debt, a broken agreement letter and a ‘before court’ letter (all photocopies of originals).
Could anyone advise what I do now as I presume they’ve sent the same to the court. Their first letter says they do not want to have a representative attend court because they have provided evidence of everything and it would prejudice their case if they weren’t allowed to just rely on the evidence submitted. They end it with asking for the court to grant judgement for the debt with costs and without the need of a hearing.
I’m out of my depth now as I don’t know what the process is, if I will automatically get a CCJ now, if the documents sent are correct, if it matters that they called me ‘she’ or whether there is anything else I can do to avoid a CCJ. This is something I’d like to avoid if possible.
Thank you
There is a couple of forms at the beginning which outline the case, however, I’m referred to as a ‘she’ and I’m a ‘he’ (I don’t know if this matters). The other details are correct. This form basically tells the court what the documents are that have been submitted and acts as a glossary.
There is a credit agreement with all the terms. It has a letter on the front from my original creditor which suggests a copy of the CCA was sent when I originally requested it, making it look like I’m dragging this out unnecessarily but I didn’t receive anything at the time. This is over a year ago. There is another letter with it which suggests the creditor sent the documents to PRA Group last year and not directly to me, so it appears they didn’t send this on to me.
They have provided what they call a reconstituted credit agreement with basic terms and conditions and my name, but no date, signature or credit limit details (I don’t know if this is supposed to be part of it).
There are years worth of statements that I didn’t request, a copy of the default notice which is a photocopy. There is also a photocopy of the letter advising it was being transferred to PRA Group, a letter to confirm they have bought the debt, a broken agreement letter and a ‘before court’ letter (all photocopies of originals).
Could anyone advise what I do now as I presume they’ve sent the same to the court. Their first letter says they do not want to have a representative attend court because they have provided evidence of everything and it would prejudice their case if they weren’t allowed to just rely on the evidence submitted. They end it with asking for the court to grant judgement for the debt with costs and without the need of a hearing.
I’m out of my depth now as I don’t know what the process is, if I will automatically get a CCJ now, if the documents sent are correct, if it matters that they called me ‘she’ or whether there is anything else I can do to avoid a CCJ. This is something I’d like to avoid if possible.
Thank you
Comment