In response to my question what does hearing a case mean, the Appeal Judge said that a judge would have considered the matter. Given that the application was not listed and I had to remind teh Court that the application was unheard for over a year, the judge dismissed without even knowing what it was about.
How can something be considered if it has neither been read or the party has not given a spoken account?
Is it acceptable that a matter is considered and not heard in this way - how is it fair and just?
How can something be considered if it has neither been read or the party has not given a spoken account?
Is it acceptable that a matter is considered and not heard in this way - how is it fair and just?
Comment