Search
  • Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Case law for incorrect use of WP documents

Collapse
Loading...
X
Collapse
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous Next
  • #1

    Case law for incorrect use of WP documents

    I am looking urgently for some case law that deals with WP documents being included in hearings
    ive found Jones & Anor v Lydon & Ors [2021] EWHC
    2322 (Ch) (23 August 2021
    anyone know of any others?
    Tags: None
  • #2
    search on the Civil Litigation Brief blog by Gordon Exall, a barrister:

    https://www.civillitigationbrief.com...&submit=Search
    Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.

    Litigants in Person should download and read this: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/..._in_Person.pdf
    • 1 thank

    Comment

    • #3
      Unilever v Proctor & Gamble 2000 (para. 23 of the decision) is generally the leading authority for exceptions to the WP rule. It has been added to a couple of times since then to include: interpretation of a settlement agreement, to be used as evidence in relation to terms under a settlement agreement and without notice applications.

      There's loads of case law on without prejudice rule but difficult to understand what cases are relevant without giving more context from your side.
      If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      LEGAL DISCLAIMER
      Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.
      • 1 thank

      Comment

      • #4
        rob
        Thanks
        Its to do with a case involving a claim under the sales of goods act whereby emails etc done under WP have been included in witness statements by the claimaint

        Comment

        Previous Next

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse

        Support LegalBeagles


        Donate with PayPal button

        LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

        Create a Thread
        See more
        See less

        Court Claim ?

        Guides and Letters
        Loading...



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X