Tweet
I've been on bail since 16th May this year for a summary offence. The allegations are from April this year.
In August this year the police applied to the magistrates to extend my bail while they await my phone downloads to come back.
In the application there was numerous errors mainly one saying I was arrested for breach of a non mol. This was incorrect as this had ended months prior with no breaches.
The OIC knew me and had been taken off previous cases from the year before because of the conflict of interest. This officer picked up the new allegations and was dealing with it, including her police partner doing the interview. It was made clear again about the conflict of interest and she was taken off the case. She issued a warrant of arrest and I was arrested on a plane from holiday. (Excessive arrest?).
Numerous new OIC have now been dealing with it. The application was grated and an extension to the 17th November. The application was heard after the 17th November. Why was it granted if there were clear errors in the police application?
Since that application date, the new pre charge bail rules came into affect. Why knowing an application wasn't needed from the following month was it accepted in court by paper hearing and why have the police put it in? I have paid for a solicitor and feel its been a waste of money and I have been deprived of my liberty.
I've now had another bail datevof the 10th December. No application to court, but as i believe with the new rules, its not needed.
From my understanding the police and cps are out if time to charge me for a summary offence from the 16th November (going off the time I was bailed). Why has the court also granted the extension knowing it was out of time for a charge by the time they granted it at the end of November? Am I write in what I say above and if so, how do I try and claw back my fees paid out for solicitors, excessive arrests and my deprivation of liberty being on bail when there was no right to be on bail?
In August this year the police applied to the magistrates to extend my bail while they await my phone downloads to come back.
In the application there was numerous errors mainly one saying I was arrested for breach of a non mol. This was incorrect as this had ended months prior with no breaches.
The OIC knew me and had been taken off previous cases from the year before because of the conflict of interest. This officer picked up the new allegations and was dealing with it, including her police partner doing the interview. It was made clear again about the conflict of interest and she was taken off the case. She issued a warrant of arrest and I was arrested on a plane from holiday. (Excessive arrest?).
Numerous new OIC have now been dealing with it. The application was grated and an extension to the 17th November. The application was heard after the 17th November. Why was it granted if there were clear errors in the police application?
Since that application date, the new pre charge bail rules came into affect. Why knowing an application wasn't needed from the following month was it accepted in court by paper hearing and why have the police put it in? I have paid for a solicitor and feel its been a waste of money and I have been deprived of my liberty.
I've now had another bail datevof the 10th December. No application to court, but as i believe with the new rules, its not needed.
From my understanding the police and cps are out if time to charge me for a summary offence from the 16th November (going off the time I was bailed). Why has the court also granted the extension knowing it was out of time for a charge by the time they granted it at the end of November? Am I write in what I say above and if so, how do I try and claw back my fees paid out for solicitors, excessive arrests and my deprivation of liberty being on bail when there was no right to be on bail?
