All I can suggest is assume the hearing is going ahead, prepare for it.
If the defendant is a no show then you can explain they emailed in asking to adjourn because they weren't good with computers (poor excuse) and then when you emailed the court objecting to it, the defendant then changed its tune and blamed health reasons. There is authority that if a party wishes to adjourn on medical grounds, there must be evidence to support that, otherwise the court may proceed with the trial in their absence, and you can rely on the High Court case of Levy v Ellis-Carr & Others (link here, see para. 36) where that judge concluded:
... Such evidence should identify the medical attendant and give details of his familiarity with the party's medical condition (detailing all recent consultations), should identify with particularity what the patient's medical condition is and the features of that condition which (in the medical attendant's opinion) prevent participation in the trial process, should provide a reasoned prognosis and should give the court some confidence that what is being expressed is an independent opinion after a proper examination.
As for the bundle of evidence, if the size of the bundle was too big to email, they could have sent it in parts.
Seems to me all of this is a ruse and if you summarise all of these points succinctly, the lateness of the application and the defendant shifting their position as to why the hearing should be adjourned, is not sufficient for the court to adjourn and there has to be a balance struck between justice e.g. this has been ongoing for several years and making use of the court's resources.
Might be best to document these points on a single page, bulleted so you can list the key concerns, then ask the court to proceed in their absence.
If the defendant is a no show then you can explain they emailed in asking to adjourn because they weren't good with computers (poor excuse) and then when you emailed the court objecting to it, the defendant then changed its tune and blamed health reasons. There is authority that if a party wishes to adjourn on medical grounds, there must be evidence to support that, otherwise the court may proceed with the trial in their absence, and you can rely on the High Court case of Levy v Ellis-Carr & Others (link here, see para. 36) where that judge concluded:
... Such evidence should identify the medical attendant and give details of his familiarity with the party's medical condition (detailing all recent consultations), should identify with particularity what the patient's medical condition is and the features of that condition which (in the medical attendant's opinion) prevent participation in the trial process, should provide a reasoned prognosis and should give the court some confidence that what is being expressed is an independent opinion after a proper examination.
As for the bundle of evidence, if the size of the bundle was too big to email, they could have sent it in parts.
Seems to me all of this is a ruse and if you summarise all of these points succinctly, the lateness of the application and the defendant shifting their position as to why the hearing should be adjourned, is not sufficient for the court to adjourn and there has to be a balance struck between justice e.g. this has been ongoing for several years and making use of the court's resources.
Might be best to document these points on a single page, bulleted so you can list the key concerns, then ask the court to proceed in their absence.
Comment