Tweet
Hello,
We have a contract that provides access to a market.Â* we are entitled to hosts events. receive an income, we pay the assignor a % of the income.Â* A condition of the contract is that the assignor if it wishes to set up another business has to consult all other existing contractors within a 50 mile radius.Â* the reasons behind this is it is a very limited market and the assignee has to invest in facilities.
In 2015 the assignor set up a new business 1 mile from our business.Â* One month later the assignor overturned their own decision as their staff did not provide accurate information to HQ.Â* the new business was not allowed to operate.Â* the staff member left.
Since then the assignor has continually changed the radius to introduce new business. we have brought to their attention each time they are in breach of the contract. it fell on death ears.Â* 3 weeks ago without any consultation they introduced a new business 1 mile from our business.Â* they then informed us they did not need to notify other busineses within a 50 mile radius as it was already a business granted 4 years ago.Â* they say we approved it and the mere fact they wrote to us saying they were not offering the new business to run events they now could without any consultation.
Its part and parcel of how unfortunately they operate.
They then breached the contract further by allowing by adding dates for events outside a submit ion window.Â* why they say they can. the contract states clearly dates have to be submitted at specific times.
So wed not be here if there staff member had not provided misleading information to HQ 4 years ago.Â* but because that staff member did, they say they can now allow this business to simply compete with us for the same market.Â* we will loose 50 % of our income.
In 5 years. we have had our signatures forgedÂ* and dates changed to applications made by us.Â* we have had important docs withheld in meetings by staff fully aware of the implications to us.Â* we have had staff as above actively lie to HQ about important information as detailed above that lead to the their own organisation overturning their own decisions. now this latest debarcle.
Now I suspect none of the above makes any sense at all.Â* we have at last instructed a solicitor who has written to them notifying them we believe they are breaching the terms of the contract.Â* but clearly if they set something up in 2015 even in an inproper manner and then stopped this business operatingand never did, there is an aguement that it was set up.
Why has this become such a mess. it should not be.Â* but the organisation is completely fixated by peoples wealth.Â* we are normal people operating in a rich mans game.Â* we get no support. we get difficult RDOs.Â* despite this we are the only business in the region to provide access to abled and disabled custiomers. yes in normal every day life the DDA act ensures all busineses provide access to all, but not in sport.Â* despite huge funding the above organisation allows 95 % of the venues to simply not provide any provision to Disabled customers.
How difficult is it to prove an organisation discriminates a person because of his social and economic background.Â* they want rich busineses and when they find one their doing anything to obtain it and this is what they have done to us.
what a mess.
Steveeasy
Â*Â*
We have a contract that provides access to a market.Â* we are entitled to hosts events. receive an income, we pay the assignor a % of the income.Â* A condition of the contract is that the assignor if it wishes to set up another business has to consult all other existing contractors within a 50 mile radius.Â* the reasons behind this is it is a very limited market and the assignee has to invest in facilities.
In 2015 the assignor set up a new business 1 mile from our business.Â* One month later the assignor overturned their own decision as their staff did not provide accurate information to HQ.Â* the new business was not allowed to operate.Â* the staff member left.
Since then the assignor has continually changed the radius to introduce new business. we have brought to their attention each time they are in breach of the contract. it fell on death ears.Â* 3 weeks ago without any consultation they introduced a new business 1 mile from our business.Â* they then informed us they did not need to notify other busineses within a 50 mile radius as it was already a business granted 4 years ago.Â* they say we approved it and the mere fact they wrote to us saying they were not offering the new business to run events they now could without any consultation.
Its part and parcel of how unfortunately they operate.
They then breached the contract further by allowing by adding dates for events outside a submit ion window.Â* why they say they can. the contract states clearly dates have to be submitted at specific times.
So wed not be here if there staff member had not provided misleading information to HQ 4 years ago.Â* but because that staff member did, they say they can now allow this business to simply compete with us for the same market.Â* we will loose 50 % of our income.
In 5 years. we have had our signatures forgedÂ* and dates changed to applications made by us.Â* we have had important docs withheld in meetings by staff fully aware of the implications to us.Â* we have had staff as above actively lie to HQ about important information as detailed above that lead to the their own organisation overturning their own decisions. now this latest debarcle.
Now I suspect none of the above makes any sense at all.Â* we have at last instructed a solicitor who has written to them notifying them we believe they are breaching the terms of the contract.Â* but clearly if they set something up in 2015 even in an inproper manner and then stopped this business operatingand never did, there is an aguement that it was set up.
Why has this become such a mess. it should not be.Â* but the organisation is completely fixated by peoples wealth.Â* we are normal people operating in a rich mans game.Â* we get no support. we get difficult RDOs.Â* despite this we are the only business in the region to provide access to abled and disabled custiomers. yes in normal every day life the DDA act ensures all busineses provide access to all, but not in sport.Â* despite huge funding the above organisation allows 95 % of the venues to simply not provide any provision to Disabled customers.
How difficult is it to prove an organisation discriminates a person because of his social and economic background.Â* they want rich busineses and when they find one their doing anything to obtain it and this is what they have done to us.
what a mess.
Steveeasy
Â*Â*
