Tweet
riginally posted by Rongo
The Document I requested before was "original" submitted by Defendant to Searchflow. They of course knew that the original is not retained by SearchFlow, on discovery of the forgery of documents (year date Os coordinates etc) I applied for Defendant to obtain an "original" Document which contains a "micro copy" of the original. They never disclosed this fact nor about the other document which was a fraudulent one. They had submitted totally different Ttle Plan for Registration and signed Banks Report on title stating they had checked all the Search Dicuments and no impediments to good resale!! The Court refused me so I appealed stating the fact that it would show that Defendant had actually submitted the wrong OS Details and altered the Details received from Searchflow by obscuring them at bottom of micro map. in their statement of truth a Partner in the Firm had put forward the ridiculous hypothesis that SearchFlow had given correct OS and Severn Trent had simply decided to use their own Coordinates, but this is proven to be a lie, as SiteCheck also would have received and used the same Plan. I have been told my Appeal is without merit!! So supposedly cannot appeal, but the CPR Rules are that disclosure continues until end of trial, not had a trial yet. So is there a rule/law or as with CPR a duty on the Court to Apply the CPR Rules where information re a document has been deliberately withhelld by defendant. This ruling if I don't try means I have lost everything and I'm 71 next week! the Court are ignoring their own Rules and allowing the Defendant to commit contempt of court by signing statement of truth stating all true. Apologies for bending your ear! I have been up all night looking for a way to get this appeal allowed. It cannot be justice for Court to refuse, 4 pages involved & SearchFlow can send copies by email to them, so is neither abuse of process by me or legal to refuse it.Is
The Document I requested before was "original" submitted by Defendant to Searchflow. They of course knew that the original is not retained by SearchFlow, on discovery of the forgery of documents (year date Os coordinates etc) I applied for Defendant to obtain an "original" Document which contains a "micro copy" of the original. They never disclosed this fact nor about the other document which was a fraudulent one. They had submitted totally different Ttle Plan for Registration and signed Banks Report on title stating they had checked all the Search Dicuments and no impediments to good resale!! The Court refused me so I appealed stating the fact that it would show that Defendant had actually submitted the wrong OS Details and altered the Details received from Searchflow by obscuring them at bottom of micro map. in their statement of truth a Partner in the Firm had put forward the ridiculous hypothesis that SearchFlow had given correct OS and Severn Trent had simply decided to use their own Coordinates, but this is proven to be a lie, as SiteCheck also would have received and used the same Plan. I have been told my Appeal is without merit!! So supposedly cannot appeal, but the CPR Rules are that disclosure continues until end of trial, not had a trial yet. So is there a rule/law or as with CPR a duty on the Court to Apply the CPR Rules where information re a document has been deliberately withhelld by defendant. This ruling if I don't try means I have lost everything and I'm 71 next week! the Court are ignoring their own Rules and allowing the Defendant to commit contempt of court by signing statement of truth stating all true. Apologies for bending your ear! I have been up all night looking for a way to get this appeal allowed. It cannot be justice for Court to refuse, 4 pages involved & SearchFlow can send copies by email to them, so is neither abuse of process by me or legal to refuse it.Is
