I am currently involved in a case where a person was reported for threatening behaviour - the victim has now become the accused after the original aggressor has spectaularly played the race card and invented a whole different scenario to what actually happened. There is CCTV, but no audio - no blows are exchanged. The aggressor has persuaded/co-erced a fellow employee to back up their fictitious pack of lies, who is purporting to be an "independent witness", even though they are work colleagues and "friends" on Facebook. The CCTV shows the "independent witness" leaving the scene prior to the events unfolding. The police have not been in contact since February when the original victim was asked to attend a voluntary interview, when it quickly became apparent that he was now the suspect. Last night they showed up at the home address, demanding to see a utility bill to confirm that he lived at the actual address. Apparently he is being summoned to face charges. How worried should he be? There was no racist element whatsoever in his actions, and he was the one "offered outside" by the gentlman in question, who just happens to be Asian.
"He said/She Said" case when the "victim" plays the racecard?
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Yes I have complete CCTV footage and printed off stills to show her leaving the scene before the exchange took place. I also have statements that they both made to their employers days before they were interviewed by the police and the two sets of statements vary dramatically!! In the set that were made to the employer, there was no mention of any racism by the “independent witness” and she herself stated that she had to leave to book on and no record by the alleged “victim” of any actual racist remarks that were alleged to have been made, but in their statements to the police which were made days, if not weeks later, there is a very detailed and colourful description of the insults that were allegedly made!
Comment
-
I assume the police statements would be, the ones given to the employer wouldn’t be, but they are on the company records! I am not sure who is pushing this forward, but think it’s the British Transport Police, rather than the alleged “victim” - I can’t imagine that the “independent witness” will want to go to court, as if she is found to be lying, she could well lose her job as well!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostI am currently involved in a case where a person was reported for threatening behaviour - the victim has now become the accused after the original aggressor has spectaularly played the race card and invented a whole different scenario to what actually happened.
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostLast night they showed up at the home address, demanding to see a utility bill to confirm that he lived at the actual address. Apparently he is being summoned to face charges.
Comment
-
It was originally reported to the British Transport Police as the original victim wanted the threat of violence against him logged, in case there were any questions asked by his employer - in their investigations they obviously chose to believe the original aggressor’s version of events. So at the point at which he attended for a voluntary interview, he was being questioned on a charge of racially aggravated fear of violence. I fail to see how it passes the CPS requirements - do they have sufficient evidence and is it in the public interest?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostIt was originally reported to the British Transport Police as the original victim wanted the threat of violence against him logged, in case there were any questions asked by his employer - in their investigations they obviously chose to believe the original aggressor’s version of events.
I am confused why you're referring to an employer - how does this come into the picture?
Originally posted by ghostbot View Postin their investigations they obviously chose to believe the original aggressor’s version of events.
Just because someone is a colleague or a friend on Facebook does not mean that they should not be allowed to give a witness statement. If that statement can be corroborated with additional evidence, then it does not look good for the person who is accused here.
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostI fail to see how it passes the CPS requirements - do they have sufficient evidence and is it in the public interest?
Comment
-
In response to “Another Level” - yes, it did happen at a railway station and CCTV shows no other witnesses, including the alleged “independent” witness leaving the location BEFORE the alleged incident takes place. It wS reported to the employer as the person involved has high level security clearances any possible police issues have to be reported to the employer! The question is how can the two statements the individuals have given to firstly the employer and dats, if not weeks, later vary so wildly? Would this not set alarm bells ringing that someone is not telling the truth?
Surely if someone is a colleague or friend their testimony is not wholly independent? And independent witness would surely be a third party who has no involvement with either party?
At this point I don’t know if anyone has been charged - the BTP said it was out of their hands and a summons to appear at Court would be issued shortly. I have never known the police randomly I sit someone’s home and ask for a utility bill late on a Friday night, when they have already accessed both the Electoral Roll and the DVLA to establish the person’s residence - feels very heavy handed and smacks of intimidation to me! So much for a person being innocent until proven guilty, especially if you happen to be in the minority of white, male, heterosexual, over 50!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ostell View PostBut of one of the "witnesses" was recorded on CCTV before the alleged incident took place then that person is not a witness at all.
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostIn response to “Another Level” - yes, it did happen at a railway station and CCTV shows no other witnesses, including the alleged “independent” witness leaving the location BEFORE the alleged incident takes place.
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostThe question is how can the two statements the individuals have given to firstly the employer and dats, if not weeks, later vary so wildly? Would this not set alarm bells ringing that someone is not telling the truth?
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostSurely if someone is a colleague or friend their testimony is not wholly independent? And independent witness would surely be a third party who has no involvement with either party?
Originally posted by ghostbot View PostAt this point I don’t know if anyone has been charged - the BTP said it was out of their hands and a summons to appear at Court would be issued shortly. I have never known the police randomly I sit someone’s home and ask for a utility bill late on a Friday night, when they have already accessed both the Electoral Roll and the DVLA to establish the person’s residence - feels very heavy handed and smacks of intimidation to me! So much for a person being innocent until proven guilty, especially if you happen to be in the minority of white, male, heterosexual, over 50!
Are you sure they were not checking that they were complying with the terms of bail?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AnotherLevel View Post
How do we know that a witness did not hear the incident from an angle not caught by a camera?
The witness has freely admitted that she had to leave to go and book on in a completely different area from the station.
Is it possible that someone could have heard the incident, but not appeared on CCTV? You said there was threatening behaviour, so I'm assuming that voices were raised. Is it possible that the sound travelled beyond the scope of one camera?
The platform was deserted, and all four cameras show there is no-one in the vicinity.
How did you get the police witness statement? As far as I am aware, police never normally disclose the names of their witnesses and their statements until the disclosure stage after charges have been brought.
The witness statements were read out to him at the voluntary interview. No charges have been brought as yet - he was interviewed "in respect of an allegation".
They might not be completely independent, but that does not mean they should be completely discredited - for example, imagine someone goes to my neighbour's house and starts shouting abuse at him. I go to see what's going on and hear the abuse. If I was the only person to hear the abuse, should I be discredited because I am friends with my neighbour?
I would agree with you on this one - but the witness wasn't there - has stated she wasn't there in her statement to her employer - and her statement made to the police some time later (after which they both had a chance to sit down and concoct an alternative version of events) is wildly different.
This bit seems a bit strange to me. I thought the police check this before placing someone on bail.
Are you sure they were not checking that they were complying with the terms of bail?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ghostbot View Post
He, as yet, has not been charged and therefore there are no bail conditions.
If the police do not have sufficient evidence but believe there is a case, they can place someone on pre-charge bail pending further investigations. This would be used in cases where there is a chance someone might not surrender in the future or talk to the witnesses etc.
I can't really get my head around why the police would turn up at the property, unless they have real reason to believe the address given was incorrect.
Comment
-
That's what I can't get my head around - he has had no contact with the police since the "voluntary interview" in February - he has not been advised that he has been charged or that he is on bail. The police were asked when they arrived at the address whether they had already checked both the electoral roll and the DVLA, and they confirmed that they had, and when asked what both sources said, they confirmed that both sources had the address recorded as the same one they had visited. Seems like intimidation tactics to me - the "suspect" for want of a better word was not at the address at the time, and at 9:00pm on a Friday night, one can only assume that they had the intention of arresting the "suspect", or had nothing better to do than go on a jolly car outing to pass away the hours until their shift ended.
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
1 of 2
<
>
SHORTCUTS
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Directions Questionnaire
If you received a court claim and would like some help and support dealing with it, please read the first steps and make a new thread in the forum with as much information as you can.
NOTE: If you receive a court claim note these dates in your calendar ...
Acknowledge Claim - within 14 days from Service
Defend Claim - within 28 days from Service (IF you acknowledged in time)
If you fail to Acknowledge the claim you may have a default judgment awarded against you, likewise, if you fail to enter your defence within 28 days from Service.
We now feature a number of specialist consumer credit debt solicitors on our sister site, JustBeagle.com
If your case is over £10,000 or particularly complex it may be worth a chat with a solicitor, often they will be able to help on a fixed fee or CFA (no win, no fee) basis.
2 of 2
<
>
Support LegalBeagles
See more
See less
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment