Re: Primark shoplift DBS check
What you did was wrong, but in the event it caused no loss or damage, so what do you think you are paying for?
IMO RLP do a greater wrong by applying false pressure to the vulnerable to line their own pockets.
Vigilantism includes deceit and a pretence of legality and I regard it as a lot worse than a small theft.
We have a system of law in the UK and if Primark want some form of satisfaction they should use the courts.
It is totally wrong that they are allowed to write misleading letters in a pseudo legal language to threaten and cajole their victims into paying "compensation" which is not due.
Please do not feed them
What you did was wrong, but in the event it caused no loss or damage, so what do you think you are paying for?
IMO RLP do a greater wrong by applying false pressure to the vulnerable to line their own pockets.
Vigilantism includes deceit and a pretence of legality and I regard it as a lot worse than a small theft.
We have a system of law in the UK and if Primark want some form of satisfaction they should use the courts.
It is totally wrong that they are allowed to write misleading letters in a pseudo legal language to threaten and cajole their victims into paying "compensation" which is not due.
Please do not feed them
Comment