Tweet
Re: Yet another faulty secondhand car thread :\
IMO your particulars do not have to be so detailed. The details are supplied in later documentation
Ford Ka vehicle reg no. CE55 UDY purchased on 11/3/2016 for £800 cash from the defendant. I rejected this vehicle under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, as it was not of satisfactory quality nor fit for purpose.
The defendant has failed on 3 occasions, namely 18th-19th April 2016, 25th-26th April 2016 and 9th May-13th May 2016, to rectify the issues. and has failed to respond to a
letter before action delivered on 17th May 2016.
And the claimant claims;
1)purchase price £800
2)Cost of cancellation of motor insurance £ (TBC)
3)Cost of taxi fares to pick up car on two occasions £20
4)Costs relating to loss of earnings £45 (3 hours @ £15 p/h).
5)Interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 at an annual rate of 8%.
6)Costs.
You might find this link useful:https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...+web+FINAL.pdf
IMO your particulars do not have to be so detailed. The details are supplied in later documentation
Ford Ka vehicle reg no. CE55 UDY purchased on 11/3/2016 for £800 cash from the defendant. I rejected this vehicle under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, as it was not of satisfactory quality nor fit for purpose.
The defendant has failed on 3 occasions, namely 18th-19th April 2016, 25th-26th April 2016 and 9th May-13th May 2016, to rectify the issues. and has failed to respond to a
letter before action delivered on 17th May 2016.
And the claimant claims;
1)purchase price £800
2)Cost of cancellation of motor insurance £ (TBC)
3)Cost of taxi fares to pick up car on two occasions £20
4)Costs relating to loss of earnings £45 (3 hours @ £15 p/h).
5)Interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 at an annual rate of 8%.
6)Costs.
You might find this link useful:https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-cont...+web+FINAL.pdf
Comment