Dear Sirs,
I am a bit unclear on the above principle relating to section 15 of the Equality Act 2010.
In short, I saw a hospital consultant over many years in respect to a health condition amounting to a disability. I raised a complaint regarding administration issues (failures in communication from the consultant) and the overall management of my health condition.
The consultant subsequently refused to see me and ended the patient/consultant relationship on the basis that I raised a complaint against him (contrary to General Medical Council guidance).
I have been informed, rightly or wrongly, that section 15 is not called into question as the reason for the unfavourable treatment was due to the fact that I raised a complaint and therefore the ill-treatment in question was not deemed to be connected to a disability.
This is somewhat confusing as:
Can someone please clear this one up?
Any case law would also be appreciated as most of the case law I have found relates to Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions which are obviously not in a goods and services context.
I understand it may be early days for this statute and hopefully the Supreme Court won't make a mess of it (again as with London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm).
Many thanks in advance.
I am a bit unclear on the above principle relating to section 15 of the Equality Act 2010.
In short, I saw a hospital consultant over many years in respect to a health condition amounting to a disability. I raised a complaint regarding administration issues (failures in communication from the consultant) and the overall management of my health condition.
The consultant subsequently refused to see me and ended the patient/consultant relationship on the basis that I raised a complaint against him (contrary to General Medical Council guidance).
I have been informed, rightly or wrongly, that section 15 is not called into question as the reason for the unfavourable treatment was due to the fact that I raised a complaint and therefore the ill-treatment in question was not deemed to be connected to a disability.
This is somewhat confusing as:
- without the disability I would not have raised the complaint.
- this is not too dissimilar to and employee being fired for a period of absence which relates to a disability. This is prohibited and the matter turns to the employer's justification.
Can someone please clear this one up?
Any case law would also be appreciated as most of the case law I have found relates to Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions which are obviously not in a goods and services context.
I understand it may be early days for this statute and hopefully the Supreme Court won't make a mess of it (again as with London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm).
Many thanks in advance.
Comment