Our house suffered extensive damage by a lightening strike last year. Insurance co appointed surveyor who appointed builder. We had an oral agreement with the builder that double glazing would be installed even tho it didnt form part of the insurance claim because there "was plenty of money in the job to cover windows". On that basis, naievely, we pushed for him to get the job.
Now six months after we have moved back in the builder has billed us for the windows and threatening to take us to Court.
We had no estimates, signed no contract or had anything to do with the windows. They were installed by a local company and the builder paid for them (eventually).
If this goes to Court and we are relying on verbal agreements only, what would be the likely outcome?
Now six months after we have moved back in the builder has billed us for the windows and threatening to take us to Court.
We had no estimates, signed no contract or had anything to do with the windows. They were installed by a local company and the builder paid for them (eventually).
If this goes to Court and we are relying on verbal agreements only, what would be the likely outcome?
Comment