Hi - not sure if any "oldies" still here ? If so hello .
I will try and keep a long story short . My sister booked an intensive driving course on line. As she is an older driver and has suffered panic attacks in the past she was very specific about her requirements for the instructor e.g he knew the area etc etc. The web site very specifically said all our instructors are fully qualified and display their green badge. The lessons were terrible - the instructor did not display his badge and fell asleep on one lesson . she complained several times but had no choice but to continue as the instructor took all the money up front. On the day of the test she found out the instructors was actually not fully qualified . She failed the test. I know that is not illegal as such, but we have done a LBA on the basis that the website constituted a critical part of the contract- so breach of contract - she was misled and the choice of changing to a fully qualified instructor was taken away from her because she did not know until the day of the test. They have basically said go ahead with the action as she carried on with the lessons and did not complain not true she complained several times . Also they refused to give the instructors full name and it turned out he had given a false name anyway. Should we continue to small claims court or could trading standards help?
I will try and keep a long story short . My sister booked an intensive driving course on line. As she is an older driver and has suffered panic attacks in the past she was very specific about her requirements for the instructor e.g he knew the area etc etc. The web site very specifically said all our instructors are fully qualified and display their green badge. The lessons were terrible - the instructor did not display his badge and fell asleep on one lesson . she complained several times but had no choice but to continue as the instructor took all the money up front. On the day of the test she found out the instructors was actually not fully qualified . She failed the test. I know that is not illegal as such, but we have done a LBA on the basis that the website constituted a critical part of the contract- so breach of contract - she was misled and the choice of changing to a fully qualified instructor was taken away from her because she did not know until the day of the test. They have basically said go ahead with the action as she carried on with the lessons and did not complain not true she complained several times . Also they refused to give the instructors full name and it turned out he had given a false name anyway. Should we continue to small claims court or could trading standards help?
Comment