Hi all.
So...
I took a company to Court - over a warranty issue. It is a clear open and shut case.
Couldn't attend the final hearing because I had to go to a funeral.
Made submissions etc well in advance.
Paid for a transcript of the hearing, after the Judge unbelievably struck the case out.
The transcription company told me that only the judgements could be transcribed/sent, but not the hearing - there was a malfunction of the Court's recording equipment and you could not hear the lawyers representing the Defence. I was told that large parts of any transcript would therefore be absent. I had the Judgement transcript, but had no idea how said judgements were reached.
I pursued the Court for three months as I believed that the case now had to be reversed, all my fees refunded, and then the trial start again.
The Court kept telling me they had listened to the recording and it was fine.
Finally, a few weeks ago, the transcribers accepted that they had made an error in stating there was a Court mistake, and, unsolicited, they sent me the transcript of the hearing itself, with only a few parts denoted as 'INAUDIBLE'.
I clearly could have appealed the decision based on the sheer amount of lies the defence told at trial.
However, I've been told that too much time had now passed to appeal.
Further, I am soon leaving the UK for good and the time I had to appeal or start a new claim, and attend a hearing in person, something which has now been shown as being absolutely essential, has passed.
Should I hold the transcribers responsible for this? And take them to Court? Or complain to the Court's mediators/adjudicators on such matters? They have one for transcriber issues at Petty France.
My thinking is that if not told from the start that the Court were at fault here, I would have pursued the transcript and appeal.
So...
I took a company to Court - over a warranty issue. It is a clear open and shut case.
Couldn't attend the final hearing because I had to go to a funeral.
Made submissions etc well in advance.
Paid for a transcript of the hearing, after the Judge unbelievably struck the case out.
The transcription company told me that only the judgements could be transcribed/sent, but not the hearing - there was a malfunction of the Court's recording equipment and you could not hear the lawyers representing the Defence. I was told that large parts of any transcript would therefore be absent. I had the Judgement transcript, but had no idea how said judgements were reached.
I pursued the Court for three months as I believed that the case now had to be reversed, all my fees refunded, and then the trial start again.
The Court kept telling me they had listened to the recording and it was fine.
Finally, a few weeks ago, the transcribers accepted that they had made an error in stating there was a Court mistake, and, unsolicited, they sent me the transcript of the hearing itself, with only a few parts denoted as 'INAUDIBLE'.
I clearly could have appealed the decision based on the sheer amount of lies the defence told at trial.
However, I've been told that too much time had now passed to appeal.
Further, I am soon leaving the UK for good and the time I had to appeal or start a new claim, and attend a hearing in person, something which has now been shown as being absolutely essential, has passed.
Should I hold the transcribers responsible for this? And take them to Court? Or complain to the Court's mediators/adjudicators on such matters? They have one for transcriber issues at Petty France.
My thinking is that if not told from the start that the Court were at fault here, I would have pursued the transcript and appeal.
Comment