I’m looking to maybe find a solicitor to initially look over a loan and contract agreement my mum took out with a local County Council and its affiliated organisations for home improvements.
Approximately two years ago my mum took out a loan of £15,000 with:
Lamp Finance
This is the organisation the council use to administer its loan funds for home improvements. The loan was underwritten against the sale of my mum’s house, and payable on the house being sold.
A schedule of works was drawn up (around 5/8 jobs) by a council surveyor and an organisation called C&R was instructed by the council to oversee the work of an approved builder.
This builder turned out to be completely incompetent and all of his work had to be redone. Part of the initial contract work was to fix two roof leaks, the builder failed to fix one leak and the other was made considerably worse. Either the builder didn’t do a good job or the initial council’s surveyors report and subsequent schedule of works was incorrect.
When the leaks were not fixed satisfactorily my mum lodged an official complaint with both C&R and the local council to ask for rectification and refused to sign off the remaining payment to the builder until rectification work was complete.
However this complaint was essentially ignored and the council authorised “Lamp” the loan provider to pay the builder in full and close the project. Part of the loan agreement contained an amount for “unforeseen works” and with project closure this money was no longer available. As the builder had been paid in full my mum no longer had any leverage with him to fix the leaks satisfactorily.
I would like a solicitor to look at two aspects of this case:
Firstly I believe the loan agreement and contract may have essentially by an unfair agreement. My mum undertook a loan secured on her home, but has had no say on when it was paid out, with money being released by the council without her express authorisation.
Secondly, we instructed supposedly experts to fix two leaks both of which still exist today, either the council surveyor got it wrong and recommended incorrect resolute works or the builder carried out shoddy workmanship. I’d like to ascertain who is liable for this and what legal rights do we have.
I’d be interested to see if people here believe we may have a case and any recommendation of a good solicitor that specialises in this area.
Thanks, Neil
Approximately two years ago my mum took out a loan of £15,000 with:
Lamp Finance
This is the organisation the council use to administer its loan funds for home improvements. The loan was underwritten against the sale of my mum’s house, and payable on the house being sold.
A schedule of works was drawn up (around 5/8 jobs) by a council surveyor and an organisation called C&R was instructed by the council to oversee the work of an approved builder.
This builder turned out to be completely incompetent and all of his work had to be redone. Part of the initial contract work was to fix two roof leaks, the builder failed to fix one leak and the other was made considerably worse. Either the builder didn’t do a good job or the initial council’s surveyors report and subsequent schedule of works was incorrect.
When the leaks were not fixed satisfactorily my mum lodged an official complaint with both C&R and the local council to ask for rectification and refused to sign off the remaining payment to the builder until rectification work was complete.
However this complaint was essentially ignored and the council authorised “Lamp” the loan provider to pay the builder in full and close the project. Part of the loan agreement contained an amount for “unforeseen works” and with project closure this money was no longer available. As the builder had been paid in full my mum no longer had any leverage with him to fix the leaks satisfactorily.
I would like a solicitor to look at two aspects of this case:
Firstly I believe the loan agreement and contract may have essentially by an unfair agreement. My mum undertook a loan secured on her home, but has had no say on when it was paid out, with money being released by the council without her express authorisation.
Secondly, we instructed supposedly experts to fix two leaks both of which still exist today, either the council surveyor got it wrong and recommended incorrect resolute works or the builder carried out shoddy workmanship. I’d like to ascertain who is liable for this and what legal rights do we have.
I’d be interested to see if people here believe we may have a case and any recommendation of a good solicitor that specialises in this area.
Thanks, Neil
Comment