Following on from my last thread yesterday. The defendant has listed what he believes are the facts what took place and has given a different account of our telephone conversations than the one I recall, as I'm sure this is going to go to court eventually would I be better responding to his version of events and quoting what he has said or tell the story as I see it?
The reason I ask is because I didn't give a full account of the incident and subsequent communication in the Letter Before Action that I sent, I merely explained that I held him responsible for the costs that I'd incurred and would take court action if the full costs were not reimbursed in 14 days of my writing to him, just wondering would a judge want a full written explanation of my side of the incident that occurred or does that come later when filing a claim in the small claims court.
The reason I ask is because I didn't give a full account of the incident and subsequent communication in the Letter Before Action that I sent, I merely explained that I held him responsible for the costs that I'd incurred and would take court action if the full costs were not reimbursed in 14 days of my writing to him, just wondering would a judge want a full written explanation of my side of the incident that occurred or does that come later when filing a claim in the small claims court.
Comment