A friend of mine has asked me for help in sorting out a dilemma.
He has a site, which is owned by the person who set up his site. He did not like the constant barrage of charges being levied on him by this company, and told them to pull the plug.
The site has now been removed from the net but the company is demanding money to release the domain name elsewhere (£50) as I understand it. He told the company to kill the domain name as well as the site and that, as far as he was concerned, he owed nothing. As he disowned the domain name and the site.
He was apparently paid up to date at the time of pulling the plug. Can he still be liable for levies simply because the domain name is still 'live'.
I have had several domain names that I owned and ran sites for a local building company, all at cost. When they called to cancel a site and promote a new one, I asked my hosts and domain name registrar and they said simply let it die on renewal date - NO CHARGE!
He has a site, which is owned by the person who set up his site. He did not like the constant barrage of charges being levied on him by this company, and told them to pull the plug.
The site has now been removed from the net but the company is demanding money to release the domain name elsewhere (£50) as I understand it. He told the company to kill the domain name as well as the site and that, as far as he was concerned, he owed nothing. As he disowned the domain name and the site.
He was apparently paid up to date at the time of pulling the plug. Can he still be liable for levies simply because the domain name is still 'live'.
I have had several domain names that I owned and ran sites for a local building company, all at cost. When they called to cancel a site and promote a new one, I asked my hosts and domain name registrar and they said simply let it die on renewal date - NO CHARGE!
Comment