Hi there,
My husband and I signed a contract for an upfront payment for estate agency services a while ago, and due to issues in selling our flat we are yet to sell it over 2 years later. We always thought that the contract lasted forever as we don’t remember being told that there was a limited duration on the website (it still isn’t there over 2 years later), in conversation nor in the contract. The estate agents are now saying that the contract was only actually for 3 months. We would have never have paid £1800 up front for a 3 month window as we had already tried to sell with another estate agent for about 6 months with no luck, and several flats in the building had been for sale for a year at that point with no luck either. Looking through the contract there is ‘three month sole agency agreement’ at the top of the first page, but none of the terms across the 6 pages talk about a limited duration. I suspect when signing we were rushing with the agent in the room, briefly read the terms but completely missed the words at the top (as you often do with a subtitle). Does anyone know if this is okay to do? I studied contract law as part of my accountancy exams and I thought duration of a contract had to be clearly explained in the clauses, and the signer can’t be relied on to see something such as a subtitle. Please let me know if anyone agrees or disagrees
My husband and I signed a contract for an upfront payment for estate agency services a while ago, and due to issues in selling our flat we are yet to sell it over 2 years later. We always thought that the contract lasted forever as we don’t remember being told that there was a limited duration on the website (it still isn’t there over 2 years later), in conversation nor in the contract. The estate agents are now saying that the contract was only actually for 3 months. We would have never have paid £1800 up front for a 3 month window as we had already tried to sell with another estate agent for about 6 months with no luck, and several flats in the building had been for sale for a year at that point with no luck either. Looking through the contract there is ‘three month sole agency agreement’ at the top of the first page, but none of the terms across the 6 pages talk about a limited duration. I suspect when signing we were rushing with the agent in the room, briefly read the terms but completely missed the words at the top (as you often do with a subtitle). Does anyone know if this is okay to do? I studied contract law as part of my accountancy exams and I thought duration of a contract had to be clearly explained in the clauses, and the signer can’t be relied on to see something such as a subtitle. Please let me know if anyone agrees or disagrees
Comment