• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Fault on car minutes after driving away - options?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fault on car minutes after driving away - options?

    Hi all,

    I am posting this on behalf of a friend who has had some advice already on another (non-legal driven) forum but I spend a fair bit going through various threads on here so I thought it would be worth asking

    Vehicle Details:
    Audi Q5 £35000/35000 miles
    Payment Method: 16k Part Ex, £99 reservation on credit card, £2000 on credit card and rest via debit card

    Purchased from:
    One of the largest Group dealers in Europe with multiple branches all over for specific brands - in this case, it is a BMW dealer although car is a non-BMW

    Timeline:
    1. Car test-driven once lockdown 2.0 was eased (3/12?) and reserved via credit card £99.
    2. Picked car up 12/12/2020, had quick visual inspection, started car, tested basic functionality, all good
    3. Under 5 minutes into drive home (100+ miles), noticed air con was off and ability to switch on failed (options greyed out to switch on)
    4. Drove back to dealership who due to being BMW, took it to their Audi specialist who did their 100+ point check and MOT.
    5. 20 minutes later car was back stating air con gas was out and needed regassing but they could not do it. Sales Manager handed car back over to new owner and said to get it done locally, he would reimburse.

    6. Said owner took car into Audi main dealer for a Air con service 16/12 as many locals cannot do it due to a newer gas? Audi after 4 hours handed car back stating they cannot do it due to it "having an issue" and would need the car for 3 days : day 1 to add dye to find leaks in the system + trace fault and diagnose. If parts required to be ordered in, this can take 1-2 days and then finally fitting.
    They key part however is: If part is under warranty (car is still under 3 years old), its free but if external influence eg a rock hitting the compressor which seems to be a common issue, this is chargeable.

    7.Rebooked in for the 4th Jan but without loan car as the earliest they have one is end of Jan.

    The supplying dealer are quite transparent on their order form in regards to CRA and specifically state the 30 day/6 month rules so I don't think he has any issues with this especially as they accepted the fault was there minutes after what should have been a problem-free drive post sale.
    Also all discussions have been recorded.

    Questions:
    1. Given the fault was reported within minutes of leaving the dealership, has this stopped the 30 day CRA clock from that moment?
    2. If dealer does not want to pay the dealer he is using (another main dealer group) and insists on returning to his specialist, does he have to comply or can he then just reject at that point? Reason for this question is he does not trust their specialist - more on this later but also they're over 100 miles away.
    3. As he part-exed a car towards it, if rejected, can he insist on the monetary value given of this instead of the car back which has now lost it's part-ex value if he were to trade it in elsewhere or can he claim the difference back? (Potentially £1000-£1500)
    4. If it were to be rejected, would costs paid on the day be refunded? ie road tax paid would lose a month of it, the cherished plate would incur an £80 fee to put back on certificate etc
    5. Does the dealership have to accept the rejection within the 30 days or would they still require to first examine the car/faults (despite having already seen them )
    6. Finally, the fact holidays are round the corner, back to Q5, does the dealership have to formally accept or if it was rejected on Xmas day or while closed due to Covid, this is still legit.


    140 point check on 14/10/2020
    Most are minor but all the boxes were ticked for this check however in reality:
    *Air conditioning/Outlet temperature (heating and cooling) : does not even switch on and error code stored suggests this stopped in May 2020.
    *Fault codes wiped: Total of 9 faults existed on the fault scan though only the Air con one has come back as expected. The rest were much older so not a worry but clearly not wiped as per check
    *Wipers: Rear wiper drags badly but he'll just replace the blade as they're so cheap these days.
    *Keys: 1 fob works to lock and open boot but not unlock. Caught him out at the dealership when the specialist returned the car, second set was in the car, faulty fob used to lock the car and then could not unlock without using the hidden key. They are ordering in a new fob. Relating to the key should be a plastic key containing a code to pair the car to a phone app, this is missing and is going to cost £60 to replace which the supplying dealer has said they will not reimburse as its not part of their requirements even though "Audi Connect" was listed as a feature of the listing.
    *The dealer will check all vehicles sold will have appropriate manufacturer recall actions completed: The work order job card for the 16th from Audi, 2 recalls were not carried out previously.

    Nothing hugely major but missed all the same

    Final thoughts:

    He likes the car so happy to get it fixed and reject only if there is likely to be a big job resulting in many key components to be removed or supplying dealer do not want to pay - a compressor replacement can go into the thousands. If they are happy with the car being booked in, I have advised Audi carry out a full health-check on the car as well

    Nothing so far I am being told is indicating the dealership are being cagey or obstructive and so this is more a fact-finding thread more so hampered by the fact the owner is now in Tier 4, xmas holidays are also round the corner and so things can delay the resolution if going for a repair first.

    Thanks for taking the time to go through this long thread!
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Yes, clock stops when fault is reported and restarts when fault successfully fixed.

    Comment


    • #3

      As ostell the clock stopped when dealer notified of unsatisfactory condition and does not restart until the vehicle is returned in a satisfactory condition

      Regarding other points:
      2) as purchaser has agreed to repair he cannot now reject until trader has attempted repair. It is for trader to decide where repair is carried out
      3)if p/ex is still available, that is what may be recovered
      4) the customer is entitled to claim for all his damages incurred directly
      5)There is no time limit stated in which trader must accept/decline rejection, but it would need to be reasonable
      6)customer needs to realise in these uncertain times that there could be unavoidable delays


      No need to make any decisions yet, just wait and see what develops.
      If all fails customer can make a sec75 claim against Credit card issuer

      Comment


      • #4
        Thank you both for the reply - Just need to expand on a couple of answers:

        1) Is the fact they know it via verbal/email and seen it enough to stop it or is there a formal method/letter to stop the clock?

        2) To re-iterate, he had permission to get it re-gassed only at this stage anywhere of his choice locally due to distance and not fixed by the trader. The offer of fixing further is also locally and at the choice of the purchaser not trader although this has not been accepted/declined as of yet by the trader. None of this is back to base or at the very least, this is what was agreed as the 100 mile + was silly to travel when it could be just a regas/recharge

        For sec75 unfortunately he is not covered by this as the invoice price is 35k and S75 is limited to up to 30k although he mentioned S75+?

        Comment


        • #5
          1)No formal method...as long as it is clear by word/email or even action

          2)Customer seems to have authority only to have the vehicle regassed. If more is required he should first obtain trader's authority to proceed.
          All this work should be paid for by trader, not necessarily under warranty.
          If trader wants vehicle back to carry out repairs he has to pay delivery costs both ways

          sec75+ probably referring to debit card chargeback schemes.
          They vary slightly between cards, but are unlimited in the amount covered
          More details here: Chargeback claims: how to get your money back | money.co.uk

          Comment


          • #6
            Excellent thank you once again - so in conclusion for the above notes and to wrap up tomorrow with the trader:

            1. Get authorisation FIRST from trader to allow Audi to diagnose and quote which will include the already authorised regas.
            >>>If not, reject the car.

            2. If authorised, Get authorisation FIRST from trader to proceed with quoted work to fix
            >>>If not, reject the car.

            In all instances, ensure it is obvious and evident customer is not prepared to allow the diagnostics and/or fix at the trader specialist and as there is no requirement to have this issue fixed under the 30 day period, it would be better to just reject.

            Is this fair?

            And this is purely on the basis there is no trust between trader specialist given how much they have missed including the same-day as purchase diagnostics of the issue at hand.

            Out of interest, when a car is rejected, what do the traders do in terms of no of owners?
            ie: Customer buys car with 1 previous owner making customer owner 2. Rejects vehicle, trader fixes and re-sells.
            Does new customer end up being owner 3 or do DVLA rollback no. of owners based on the reject and new owner becomes owner 2? Just curious!

            Comment


            • #7
              Yes, make sure no work is commenced by third parties without written (email sufficient) agreement from trader.

              Having agreed to having vehicle repaired the trader must be given the opportunity.
              Until he fails or refuses to repair the vehicle the right to reject is stayed.
              The customer may not insist on deciding who is to do the repair if they are going to continue to rely on CRA 2015.

              They do of course have the right to have the vehicle repaired by the engineer of their choice and then claim damages, but that is not as easy as claiming under CRA 2015


              The DVLA do not "rollback" the record, so the trader has a car that is worth slightly less!

              Comment


              • #8
                Hi again,

                The owner has had an update today following a booking into the dealership for a full healthcheck and Air Con diagnostic.

                Air Con in short is down to impact damage to the condenser which has a circa £600 cost to rectify - he is waiting for the official email/quote from Audi but verbally this is what has been told.

                From the health check, the following has been reported:

                Tyres: All 4 need replacing as 2 are same brand, 1 is budget brand, 1 is another brand whereas Audi do state for a Quattro system, it should be same brand on an axel.

                Keyfob: A new keyfob was posted to the owner however while it has the VIN number on the outer wrapper, the key is essentially a blank shell and needs coding

                Recalls have not been carried out so these would need doing (Free)

                And finally a report of slight idle shake has been reported to check as has an extra bit of turnover of the engine before it starts. This could however be a characteristic as he is more used to diesel cars and not petrol.


                An email is going back to supplying dealer to find out if they want to pay to rectify and I said I would find out from here what possible next steps are available.

                On the assumption they say NO, is it then just a case of rejecting the vehicle even if they want it returned to fix their side? From the above advice, I am reading this does not have to be the case in the first 30 days.

                If rejected, the part-ex has gone down in price by enough that there would be around a £1000 difference to purchasing a replacement like for like. Is there any way of getting this back or insist the full part-ex cost as cash

                There would also be a cost of £80 to put the plate back onto retention, cost to return it back to the supplying dealer etc.

                Currently the mileage from pickup to now is around 300 miles more with around 120 miles being the drive back from from the dealer, 20 miles being the initial drive back from dealer and return straight away when the AC issue was noticed and then two round trips to the local dealerships.

                Thanks in advance

                Comment


                • #9
                  ok supplying dealer has already authorised it so no issue there it seems

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thanks for update

                    Comment

                    View our Terms and Conditions

                    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                    Working...
                    X