Hi there.
This is my first post but I have spent the past 3 hours trawling through the forum and seen how helpful some of the replies have been so thought I would post.
I am being chased by Natwest in reference to a PG I provided on a business overdraft for a Ltd Co that has now been struck off at Companies House. I do not have a copy of the PG.
I have recently engaged an IP with the intention negotiation and Full and Final settlement, but I'm curious about the legal position.
The overdraft was renewed by the bank (after the initial 12 month term) but they then cancelled it about 6 months into the second 12 month term. The reason they gave for cancelling it was that the company had recently taken out an invoicing factoring facility with its sister bank RBS and that bank policy was that you couldn't have both.
The overdraft agreement doesn't to my reading give them a blanket right to recall it any time but instead sets out a set of conditions called Events of Default and says that is any of those occur then they can recall it. However, I have a letter on headed paper (backed up with an email) from the Bank Manager saying that he confirms none of these occurred, and the only reason it is being cancelled is because of bank policy. In this letter he also admits that he didn't inform me of this, and apologises for that.
I'm not denying the fact I signed the PG - obviously - but we were raising equity finance at the time and the bank cancelling the overdraft caused the investors to pull out and that obviously meant the company became insolvent. My argument is had they not done this we either would have traded out of the overdraft or the equity finance would have covered it.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Thanks in advance.
This is my first post but I have spent the past 3 hours trawling through the forum and seen how helpful some of the replies have been so thought I would post.
I am being chased by Natwest in reference to a PG I provided on a business overdraft for a Ltd Co that has now been struck off at Companies House. I do not have a copy of the PG.
I have recently engaged an IP with the intention negotiation and Full and Final settlement, but I'm curious about the legal position.
The overdraft was renewed by the bank (after the initial 12 month term) but they then cancelled it about 6 months into the second 12 month term. The reason they gave for cancelling it was that the company had recently taken out an invoicing factoring facility with its sister bank RBS and that bank policy was that you couldn't have both.
The overdraft agreement doesn't to my reading give them a blanket right to recall it any time but instead sets out a set of conditions called Events of Default and says that is any of those occur then they can recall it. However, I have a letter on headed paper (backed up with an email) from the Bank Manager saying that he confirms none of these occurred, and the only reason it is being cancelled is because of bank policy. In this letter he also admits that he didn't inform me of this, and apologises for that.
I'm not denying the fact I signed the PG - obviously - but we were raising equity finance at the time and the bank cancelling the overdraft caused the investors to pull out and that obviously meant the company became insolvent. My argument is had they not done this we either would have traded out of the overdraft or the equity finance would have covered it.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Thanks in advance.
Comment