Hi all,
Posting on behalf of a friend.
He was taken over by a company and made a director. The company have installed a hazardous chemical painting plant and he considers (and has sufficient proof) that the plant is unsafe due to insufficient extraction. Has asked for and been refused extraction.
He's informed them that if the extraction isn't installed soon he will not go into work.
They have recognized the possible need for extraction but have made no promises to install, however, they have offered alternative work at other premises but the extra drive is an additional 50 miles per day.
He feels he is being forced out.
What should he do? What rights does he have as a director? What about the other staff who will remain there working in the unsafe environment? Can he request/demand an independent company to verify the extraction needed?
thanks,
Jamal.
Posting on behalf of a friend.
He was taken over by a company and made a director. The company have installed a hazardous chemical painting plant and he considers (and has sufficient proof) that the plant is unsafe due to insufficient extraction. Has asked for and been refused extraction.
He's informed them that if the extraction isn't installed soon he will not go into work.
They have recognized the possible need for extraction but have made no promises to install, however, they have offered alternative work at other premises but the extra drive is an additional 50 miles per day.
He feels he is being forced out.
What should he do? What rights does he have as a director? What about the other staff who will remain there working in the unsafe environment? Can he request/demand an independent company to verify the extraction needed?
thanks,
Jamal.
Comment