• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Solicitors Liability

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Solicitors Liability

    While a solicitor would be covered under a company's insurance if he was to do something negligent. What happens when he acts say out of work and gives advice on which someone relies and it is negligent. Does his employers insurance cover this?

    Also what would the case be of an unemployed solicitor or a legal professional acting for themself giving advice, would he need his own PI insurance?

    Thanks in advance.
    The information I supply is provided for informational purposes only and, should not be construed as legal advice.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    This is an extremely complex matter and cannot be answered simply.
    For a start all practising solicitors must be covered by a Professional indemnity insurance that complies with the minimum requirements of the SRA.
    Different insurers issue policies which will, whilst adhering to the minimum requirements, exceed them in differing respects.

    Some solicitors are employed by companies, some are in partnerships and others are practising as individuals.

    If any act without PI cover they breach SRA rules

    If you are considering an action against an individual for offering negligent advice which caused you loss, it is really of no concern to you about the existence or not of insurance (unless you are concerned the individual does not have the means of compensating you and you will looking to his insurers)

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Des,

      Thank you for your reply. Fortunately this does not concern action against an individual for negligent advice. To be more specific its about legal professionals, i.e barristers/solicitors, that are practising as individuals. But from what you've said everyone giving advice in any capacity needs to be covered by PI insurance.
      The information I supply is provided for informational purposes only and, should not be construed as legal advice.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by james_law View Post
        Hi Des,

        . But from what you've said everyone giving advice in any capacity needs to be covered by PI insurance.
        Unless you advise under disclaimers such as paras 9 & 10 of the Terms of Use of this site, and the disclaimer at the base of your postings.

        Comment


        • #5
          If by legal professionals your talking barrister/solicitor and not a paralegal or some other equivalent, then for solicitors, not all that practise are required to have PII.

          In-house lawyers for example don't need PII because they will usually be covered by their employer's insurance, although it is possible the company could request the lawyer have PII, never heard of it happening though. There's special rules on in-house lawyers which is probably beyond the remit of your question so I'll leave it at that.

          PII is also not necessary where an exemption exists. For example, the PII rules allows a practising solicitor to act for friends or family members without the need for PII provided that they do not charge or receive remuneration.

          Have you checked the Law Society website as I'm sure they have a piece of the requirements of PII.

          Also take note of the below concerning new rules around PII that's likely to come into force soon.

          https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/ls...070499.article
          Last edited by R0b; 13th June 2019, 19:23:PM. Reason: wrong link
          If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          LEGAL DISCLAIMER
          Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi R0b Where did this info come from?
            "PII is also not necessary where an exemption exists. For example, the PII rules allows a practising solicitor to act for friends or family members without the need for PII provided that they do not charge or receive remuneration"
            .


            SRA RULES ; 1.3 These Rules require solicitors, RELs, RFLs, recognised bodiesand their managers and licensed bodies (in respect of their regulated activities) in private practice in England and Wales to take out and maintain professional indemnity insurance with participating insurers with effect from 1 October 2013. https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/ha...s/content.page


            As a non-practising solicitor you may do legal work for friends and relatives without a practising certificate, but not in your capacity as a solicitor. You should therefore explain (preferably in writing) at the outset that you are not doing the work as a solicitor and that you are not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
            http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/cod...etirement.page

            Comment


            • #7
              https://www.sra.org.uk/faqs/guidance...ing-no-pc.page

              The above link is the straightforward answer for the layman.

              The actual rule itself is contained in the Practice Framework Rules (10.2):

              If you are a solicitor or REL you will not be regarded as practising as a sole practitioner and you are exempt from the obligation for your practice to be a recognised sole practice if:
              ...
              (c) your practice consists entirely of:
              (i) providing professional services without remuneration for friends, relatives, companies wholly owned by you or your family, or registered charities; and/or
              https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/ha...0/content.page

              I also queried this at the time with the SRA who confirmed my understanding.

              You have to go round the mill of the Rules to fully understand but that's the exemption, however if you are acting under this exemption you should really inform the "client" that you have no PII.
              If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
              - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
              LEGAL DISCLAIMER
              Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

              Comment


              • #8
                I should also add that doesn't give you carte blanche to try and run a firm either as the end result is you being struck off, as happened to one guy earlier this year.

                https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/lates...irm-struck-off
                If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                LEGAL DISCLAIMER
                Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Many thanks for your input, this has confirmed what I thought would be the case. R0b des8
                  The information I supply is provided for informational purposes only and, should not be construed as legal advice.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thanks for the clarification R0b

                    So a solicitor acting solely for friends and family is regarded as non practising and does not need PII, so what I stated originally ( all practising solicitors must be covered by a Professional indemnity insurance) is correct

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Semantics but I'm not sure your interpretation is the right one (happy to be corrected) because if I recall, non-practising solicitors aren't entitled to undertake reserved legal activities.

                      As far as I understand, solicitors who carry out work for friends under this exemption are classified as practising solicitors who would ordinarily be considered a sole practitioner but for those specific purposes, are not regarded as one and so no PII is needed. If you are regarded as non-practising, you wouldn't be able to carry out reserved legal activities.
                      If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      LEGAL DISCLAIMER
                      Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It won't be the first or last time I've been wrong! but it does show how confusing the subject can be.

                        Anyway this is going nowhere and rather hijacking this thread
                        apologies to james_law

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Please don't apologise. I'm happy to read this discussion.
                          The information I supply is provided for informational purposes only and, should not be construed as legal advice.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by des8 View Post
                            It won't be the first or last time I've been wrong! but it does show how confusing the subject can be.

                            Anyway this is going nowhere and rather hijacking this thread
                            apologies to james_law
                            Very confusing.. one of the reasons I did not wish to be a regulatory lawyer!
                            If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
                            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            LEGAL DISCLAIMER
                            Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

                            Comment

                            View our Terms and Conditions

                            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                            Working...
                            X