On Tuesday 2 April High Court Enforcement Group attended my premises and left a letter titled VERY URGENT and in the document referred to as Writ of Control. The defendant, a Limited company, is not me nor has anything to do with me.
I have spoken to the enforcement agent yesterday who was very rude and threatening. I pointed out he had the defendant company name spelt wrong, as I had looked it up on Companies House to see if the company had listed my business as their address (they hadn't). The enforcement agent told me that they can do that under the slippage rule. The enforcement agent wants me to send a copy of my lease, which I will not do. He told me that the court had instructed him to attend my premises and he just does what the court tells him to do. That was a lie, as I have now spoken to the solicitors acting on behalf of the claimant, who advised High Court Enforcement Group made the link to my premises and instructed the enforcement agent to visit my premises. The solicitor has told me to email her a copy of the front cover of my lease, however, why do I have to prove my innocence instead of them prove I am connected?
Why is the onus on me to prove I have nothing to do with this limited company detailed on the documentation, rather than the other way around?
How can I get information on the 'link' they have made and have them remove me from their records since this is nothing to do with me? I am not part of that company, nor have I have been.
I've attached an image of the document that was left.
I have spoken to the enforcement agent yesterday who was very rude and threatening. I pointed out he had the defendant company name spelt wrong, as I had looked it up on Companies House to see if the company had listed my business as their address (they hadn't). The enforcement agent told me that they can do that under the slippage rule. The enforcement agent wants me to send a copy of my lease, which I will not do. He told me that the court had instructed him to attend my premises and he just does what the court tells him to do. That was a lie, as I have now spoken to the solicitors acting on behalf of the claimant, who advised High Court Enforcement Group made the link to my premises and instructed the enforcement agent to visit my premises. The solicitor has told me to email her a copy of the front cover of my lease, however, why do I have to prove my innocence instead of them prove I am connected?
Why is the onus on me to prove I have nothing to do with this limited company detailed on the documentation, rather than the other way around?
How can I get information on the 'link' they have made and have them remove me from their records since this is nothing to do with me? I am not part of that company, nor have I have been.
I've attached an image of the document that was left.
Comment