*** WON *** peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - HEARING 13th August

[ostell]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Looks like UKSSP have failed to file the directions questionnaire and been given another 7 days to do so. This has all the makings of the CEL/DEAL fiasco in private parking. If the case is struck out would an application for costs because of unreasonable behaviour of the claimant be in order?

[EXC]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Received this letter in the post yesterday. Need to know if I have to do anything?

Regards

Pete

I removed you name from the document for you.

[peterpiper70]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Thanks people.

So I just sit and wait then :-)

Regards

[peterpiper70]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

[MENTION=39331]ostell[/MENTION]

Ive googled but cant find any reference to a CEL/DEAL fiasco in private parking. Can I ask (purely out of interest) what that refers to?

Regards

Pete

[EXC]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

@ostell

Ive googled but cant find any reference to a CEL/DEAL fiasco in private parking. Can I ask (purely out of interest) what that refers to?

Regards

Pete

I think ostell is referring to the private parking companies whose tactics are to issue claims for non payment of parking fines in an attempt to intimidate people into settling but when it comes down to have no intention of following through and actually having the case heard in court, which could well be the same tactic employed by BPS.

[ostell]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Sorry. Yes people that DEAL attempted to take to court (private parking) then didn't turn up or cancelled at the last moment have been ordered to pay costs to the defendant because of unreasonable behaviour. About £200 seems to be the favourite amount.

This is one of them

[peterpiper70]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Ah I see, well Im not raising my hopes that he/they wont turn up!

[peterpiper70]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Received this Yesterday!!

[EXC]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Ok so hearing listed for 13 August which means your witness statement needs to be filed by 30 July.

Have a look at the other witness statements defendants have already filed to get an idea.

[peterpiper70]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Received the witness statement from UKPS this morning. Have a copy as a word document attached but it says its too big for the site. Ill try and break it up in to smaller pieces tomorrow
Regards
Pete

[Amethyst]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Would you email it to me please, its likely most of it is the same as others so only really need to bits directly appropriate to your case on here. admin@legalbeagles.info

[peterpiper70]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

[MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION]

Emailed the scanned document to you this morning

Thanks again

Pete

[Amethyst]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Witness statement from Mr Howard...

[Amethyst]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Yes it si same as usual and completely irrelevant to the case.

[Amethyst]

Re: peterpiper v UK Services & Support Passport - DEFENCE DUE BEFORE Monday, April 6,

Interestingly the witness statement doesn't include the usual list of emails and texts sent to the victim (sorry Customer)

Rest of the exhibits are pretty normal crud, screenshots of his website with bits underlined etc.

This is the two usual HMPO letters, the list of overdue charges and the letter from the ASA confirming the review is being undertaken. (no result of that STILL - possibly next Wednesday)