Tweet
Baliffs said they had been to my house twice but there was no evidence of this. After they investigated I have received a letter where they admit that they went to the wrong house therefore putting my details through someone elses door who lives close by have they breached any rights that i may have!!!
Loading...
-
Tags: None -
Re: complaint upheld
Do bears crap in the woods?Originally posted by at1 View Post
They have certainly broken your right to privacy.
They are also not due any fees for their mistaken "visits".
Which bunch of buffoons was involved and why were they seeking payment? -
Re: complaint upheld
Breach of the data protection act to be more precise CC. Go get them AT1
Make a complaint the the Information Commissioners office and send photocopies of their written admission on liability, you will get some compo and they will get a fine lol.Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (LB),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.
By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.
If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.
I AM SO GOING TO GET BANNED BY CEL FOR POSTING terrible humour POSTS.
The Governess; 6th March 2012 GRRRRRRComment
-
CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickComment
-
Re: complaint upheld
Go Get emComment
-
-
Re: complaint upheld
The right to privacy brings the Human Rights Act into play. Although it applies, mainly, to central and local government, it also applies to private-sector companies carrying out functions on behalf of central or local government, which is what this bunch of brain-dead idiots were doing, carrying out an enforcement function on behalf of a local authority. Another stick to beat the bailiff with.Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.Comment
-
Re: complaint upheld
http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...ailiff-ThreadsOriginally posted by bluebottle View PostComment
-
Re: complaint upheld
How about a letter to the bailiff company, please MR bailiff you should not post my details to an unrelated third party, and I have reported you to the ICO, who may award damages against you and a fine, which if not paid may lead to bailiff action to recover the monies from you!Comment
-
Re: complaint upheld
As many of you guys know, I was brought up in Eton.
(Or was it 'eaten & brought up'?; damn this old age! :tinysmile_cry_t
Anyway, much as I relish the opportunity to have a pop at bullies, I find myself reluctantly agreeing with labman.
Civil Procedure Rules are pretty clear on 'behaving reasonably'; I for one wouldn't like to fall foul of that if I was hauled into court.
But that, as they say, is just my opinion.CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickComment
-
Re: complaint upheld
What is at all "unreasonable" about someone other than the complainant saying that they believed it possible that the bailiff might somehow have suffered from a severe impairment of his higher cognitive functions?Comment
-
Re: complaint upheld
Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
An improbability, surely?
Being serious, though, is tarring all with the same brush really the way forward?CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickComment
-
Re: complaint upheld
Perhaps we should refer to them as being cads & bounders, or sorely lacking in the social niceties that mark a gentleman or a lady?Comment
-
CAVEAT LECTOR
This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)
You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
Cohen, Herb
There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
gets his brain a-going.
Phelps, C. C.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
The last words of John SedgwickComment
-
Re: complaint upheld
After looking at the behaviours and mannerisms of Naughton & Wayne, I have to say that how these bailiffs act just isn't cricket! Many act like the base scoundrels they are, whilst others actually follow the rules.Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
I'll get my coat...................Comment
Comment