• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

CCJ issues with Bryan Carter need advice please

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CCJ issues with Bryan Carter need advice please

    i. I am new to this forum and I am hoping someone out there can give me some advice.

    On November 15 2013 I received a letter from Bryan Carter solicitors stating that as I had not contacted them regarding an outstanding debt with Lowell Financial and they would be proceding with a County Court judgement against me. The amount they said I owed is £1541.80. As this was the first letter I had received and do not recognise Lowell as a debtor I went on your forum and read up about this Bryan Carter. I immediately sent a request in writing to Bryan Carter and Lowell for them to send me my CCA. I sent this request on 19th November and enclosed a £1 postal order. I posted the requests by Royal Mail by delivery confirmation and can confirm both Bryan and Lowell received on the 21st of Nov.
    To date, I have not received my original CCA from either.

    On Dec 5th, I received a request from the Northampton CCBC stating that Lowell was seeking a CCJ against me. I filed a defence motion and sent a request to have it thrown on the basis that Bryan and Lowell had not supplied me with my CCA within 10 days of my request and also I did not believe the debt to be mine as the claimants had not proved that the debt was in fact mine or that goods or serviced had been provided. The name mentioned in the court papers was 'Shop Direct' and I do not recognise this name as a debtor either.

    My defence with the court was ad follows:

    The defendant has no knowledge of entering into any form of purchase agreement with the claimant and is embarrassed by the lack of detail supplied within the claim.

    1.* Having no knowledge of any sales/purchase agreement for "goods" supplied and delivered to the defendant by the claimant the defendant is unable to either admit or deny anything which is not expressly denied within this defence.

    2.* The defendant formally requested a copy of any held Consumer Credit Agreement, pursuant to s.77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA1974) on 19th November 2013. This request was sent to the Claimant by Royal Mail and shows as being delivered to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on the 21st November 2013. A same request was also sent to Bryan Carter Solicitors on the 19th November 2013 and also shows as being delivered on the 21st November 2013.

    3.* The request for the original Consumer Credit Agreement required the Claimant to provide the Defendant with a true copy, or reconstituted copy of the credit agreement relating to any account that the Claimant deemed to be the Defendants, together with any other documentation the Act required them to provide. The statutory time limit to comply fully and properly with this request was 12+2 days and the Defendant has still never received a copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement. Proof of the Consumer Credit Agreement requests made by the Defendant is available at the Courts request.

    4.* In the request for the original Consumer Credit in line with the OFT Guidance, and the Consumer Credit Act, the Defendant attached a £1 payment by Royal Mail Postal Order, which was the statutory fee for the request. In this request it was noted that these funds should not be used for any other purpose and that if the Claimant was unable to comply fully and properly with this request, they should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee and then remove the incorrect entry from their systems.

    4.* The defendant denies ever purchasing goods from the claimant.

    5.* The defendant denies ever receiving goods from the claimant.

    6.* The defendant puts the claimant to strict proof of the following:-(i) That the defendant purchased goods from the claimant.(ii) The date(s) of any such alleged purchases.(iii) The delivery times of these alleged purchases.(iv) The delivery addresses of these alleged purchases.(v) Proof of a purchase/sales contract between the defendant and the claimant.*

    7.* Prima facie the Claimant knows or ought to know that there is no contract between the Defendant and the Claimant for the supply of goods as pleaded, therefore the Claimants claim is speculative and furthermore amounts to an absolute abuse of the process. Accordingly the Defendant avers the Claim ought to be struck out as an abuse as the Claimant holds no cause of action and therefore the Claimants conduct is unreasonable in bringing a claim without foundation.

    8.* The Defendant seeks the Claimants claim to be dismissed with an order as to costs thrown away in favour of the Defendant.*

    On 17th Dec I received a letter from HM Courts and Tribunal Service stating that they were in receipt of my defence and that the claimant would be in contact to resolve. Also that the claimant would inform the court how they wished to proceed.

    On 23rd Dec, I received a letter from Bryan Carter stating that their client, Lowell wished to proceed with the claim but would agree in principle mediation. A letter was also sent by Bryan to Northampton Court.

    On 23rd Dec, I received another letter from Bryan stating that their client Lowell would be willing to accept monthly installments (For me to select a sum and they would consider if it was reasonable). They asked that I sign an attached form which is a consent order stating that I agree to the monthly payments.

    The issue that I have is that although I suspect the debt may belong to me, from 2008, I have no original CCA or proof of goods or services provided by any party named in the claim. They have ignored my request made for the original CCA but respond immediately as soon as I file a defence with the courts. If I now sign this form it would be agreeing I owe this and this would then be on record with the courts. The letter says if I do not sign and agree within 7 days from the 23rd Dec then Bryan will request the order be placed against me and strike out my defence. I'm not sure how they can do this as isn't the burden of proof on them to prove to the courts that I owe this amount and it belongs to me? I really just don't want a CCJ placed against me.

    As it has been holiday time I didn't receive this letter from Bryan until yesterday so I only have until tomorrow to respond. Any help or advice you can give is greatly appreciated. As you can imagine this has caused me great amounts of distress.

    In case it helps, I can upload any documents that relate to this if needed.

    Thank you
    Tags: None

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

Announcement

Collapse

Support LegalBeagles


Donate with PayPal button

LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

See more
See less

Court Claim ?

Guides and Letters
Loading...



Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

Find a Law Firm


Working...
X